{"id":"W2165409393","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00019.x","title":"Science and Environmental Policy‐Making: Bias‐Proofing the Assessment Process","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Audit; Process (computing); Confusion; Outcome (game theory); Quality (philosophy); Reliability (semiconductor); Political science; Risk analysis (engineering); Public economics; Law and economics; Psychology; Computer science; Economics; Business; Law; Accounting; Microeconomics; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.566687,0.00148303,0.003664154,0.00735739,0.01012964,0.02747307,0.005649045,0.02265974,0.006033497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7372146,0.001949781,0.002537448,0.005874101,0.04091125,0.03398753,0.01675851,0.02106669,0.002145685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01318925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04712669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00543139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004196979,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3917812,0.4818065,0.02288868,0.02114903,0.07505336,0.007321247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1726895,0.6894381,0.04002366,0.04974376,0.0442763,0.003828648],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004380892,0.000191641,0.009371955,0.001638046,0.0006146103,0.0005227067,0.01307632,0.008307706,0.001395318,0.771747,0.01801654,0.17468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001722401,0.00007560261,0.001671856,0.001002142,0.00009049311,0.00007958504,0.0009877324,0.006579394,0.001372347,0.965393,0.02242083,0.0001547799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03917134,0.009272787,0.4667104,0.4290328,0.006685846,0.002742173,0.0002939332,0.0005612377,0.04552948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6500103,0.004998024,0.2980523,0.03300278,0.005143525,0.003320621,0.0001271469,0.0002775405,0.005067717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5343521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02299437361408557,"score_gpt":0.2037115789379781,"score_spread":0.1807172053238925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}