{"id":"W2165454835","doi":"10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300487","title":"Validity and reliability of the TED-QOL: a new three-item questionnaire to assess quality of life in thyroid eye disease","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders","field":"Medicine","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Medicine; Reliability (semiconductor); Quality of life (healthcare); Disease; Thyroid disease; Eye disease; Thyroid; Psychometrics; Quality (philosophy); Validity; Optometry; Ophthalmology; Pathology; Clinical psychology; Internal medicine; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001571363,0.0001444324,0.0007749584,0.0001221312,0.00004937821,0.000005222862,0.0002651322,0.0001938833,0.0001794758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005840567,0.0001263921,0.0002143382,0.0002795467,0.0004221843,0.0001258138,0.0001164196,0.0004813261,0.000001237909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003889985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006394414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002675171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006059698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975536,0.0006348363,0.001067718,0.0002344316,0.0002701271,0.0002393016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980931,0.0002223087,0.0005967197,0.0003272437,0.0003803998,0.0003802682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001752275,0.0007659593,0.9949014,0.0002429961,0.00003385094,0.001371548,0.0002296808,0.00001147577,0.0002102859,0.00006913501,0.000107408,0.0003040208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001636376,0.0008046,0.9828774,0.0005260615,0.0000768661,0.007884689,0.0001377765,0.000004845453,0.0001157732,0.005828788,0.000003742744,0.0001030924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964164,0.001435771,0.00006607615,0.000779773,0.0003064948,0.0003099048,0.00001861287,0.000004635318,0.0006623504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999043,0.00005182881,0.0006704492,0.00008840854,0.00005756427,0.000003995645,0.00000141914,0.00001378803,0.00006948523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01202397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6992126,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0871652258600972,"score_gpt":0.3492417533202007,"score_spread":0.2620765274601036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}