{"id":"W2165477625","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.167","title":"The paradoxical effect of warning on reaction time: Demonstrating proactive response inhibition with event-related potentials","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Neurophysiology","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Stimulus (psychology); Response inhibition; Gating; Neuroscience; Psychology; Inhibitory control; Inhibitory postsynaptic potential; Impulsivity; Event-related potential; Sensory gating; Electrophysiology; Electroencephalography; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000537588,0.0001864689,0.000391197,0.0000382554,0.0003552173,0.00001034086,0.0001340862,0.0001399782,0.000002586004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002347699,0.0000978936,0.0001502578,0.0002213734,0.0007890633,0.00007294351,0.00003477316,0.000674083,0.00008076036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009147648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001513685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.90255e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.09986e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949513,0.003485894,0.0005717048,0.0005644211,0.0001566003,0.0002700658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942702,0.005028642,0.0003583794,0.0002487042,0.0000355637,0.00005848333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01191316,0.0002328186,0.0001517355,0.000001420727,0.000007803543,0.00007140345,0.000009757499,0.00001326932,0.9745548,0.00003042247,0.00005044236,0.01296295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001849222,0.04130024,0.3992531,0.00005123186,0.00007979452,0.00007914696,0.000008744862,0.00016765,0.5563222,0.0006387689,0.00004743862,0.0002025135],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972987,0.000004238677,0.000002768451,0.001845767,0.00028257,0.0003834049,0.00000251944,0.00006604813,0.0001139618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991502,0.00002736083,0.000007212669,0.000626475,0.00006214551,0.00001294018,0.000001248976,0.00001043394,0.000101962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4182327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3991985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06388517622310723,"score_gpt":0.4054500301781582,"score_spread":0.341564853955051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}