{"id":"W2165477625","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2009.02.167","title":"The paradoxical effect of warning on reaction time: Demonstrating proactive response inhibition with event-related potentials","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Neurophysiology","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Stimulus (psychology); Response inhibition; Gating; Neuroscience; Psychology; Inhibitory control; Inhibitory postsynaptic potential; Impulsivity; Event-related potential; Sensory gating; Electrophysiology; Electroencephalography; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000864878,0.0006448129,0.0003292428,0.0003218174,0.0001447365,0.0003767797,0.0006223405,0.0009846616,0.002728752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009232664,0.0002652548,0.0001776382,0.0002615499,0.0008221662,0.0005326328,0.0003893204,0.001396722,0.0003917321],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001293931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002558683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003084922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003070347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996049,0.0001250758,0.00003098119,0.00007033278,0.0001386745,0.00003008929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959883,0.00308021,0.0003184676,0.0003532931,0.00007795303,0.0001817619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008907122,0.0004288964,0.006141742,0.0003729927,0.0001030066,0.002233536,0.000263789,0.0006978294,0.9385179,0.002285761,0.0006578779,0.03938954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001824256,0.009790863,0.3207964,0.0001363294,0.0005290579,0.02618775,0.0002343455,0.03604338,0.5734406,0.02670047,0.00421074,0.000105875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708954,0.0009098446,0.02202559,0.0006402747,0.0002153407,0.00009598035,0.0002655724,0.0002305582,0.004721434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959979,0.0002683378,0.002818548,0.0002469334,0.0001012281,0.00003047489,0.00005280601,0.00007380178,0.0004099417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002728752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00912863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06388517622310723,"score_gpt":0.4054500301781582,"score_spread":0.341564853955051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}