{"id":"W2165492362","doi":"10.16995/dscn.137","title":"What the developer saw: an outsider’s view of Annotation, Interpretation and Scholarship.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Studies / Le champ numérique","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Interpretation (philosophy); Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Field (mathematics); Digital humanities; Aside; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003092824,0.0002266905,0.0003011779,0.00006396163,0.0004683672,0.002099174,0.0002109744,0.000039973,0.00002903825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001769364,0.0001565757,0.00007669933,0.00005146598,0.0004536264,0.006605373,0.00008044892,0.0001682376,0.00001283216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003154519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003626954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001458563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000758988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988292,0.00006130819,0.0004066481,0.000260477,0.0002165025,0.0002258596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989596,0.0001255868,0.0001453173,0.0002137179,0.0004958588,0.00005993647],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004710681,0.0001162923,0.0002656101,0.00006013143,0.0001153487,0.000004231181,0.8405526,0.000004189666,0.000008522668,0.04765034,0.0004907597,0.1106849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002754951,0.0003409293,0.002148181,0.0002864719,0.000001015603,0.000008955933,0.8360545,0.00001560557,0.00008641165,0.1001874,0.06028838,0.0003066291],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.944078,0.00926544,0.00003917069,0.002728328,0.0004091467,0.0003187179,0.00003630057,0.00007807139,0.04304688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995034,0.0008300598,0.000004075733,0.001406724,0.0001727784,0.00002156857,0.00004217366,0.00001830487,0.002470269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1103782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06294597624646525,"score_gpt":0.28338791467188,"score_spread":0.2204419384254148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}