{"id":"W2165557792","doi":"10.5539/enrr.v3n1p62","title":"Estimation of the Tourism Benefits of Kakamega Forest, Kenya: A Travel Cost Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Natural Resources Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Katholischer Akademischer Ausländer-Dienst","keywords":"Recreation; Tourism; Business; Wildlife; Estimation; Cost–benefit analysis; Geography; Forest management; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Forestry; Economics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004576962,0.0004032174,0.0002492706,0.002696565,0.0003151195,0.0007653707,0.0003716043,0.000456775,0.001409325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001751757,0.0002331381,0.0005178396,0.002177245,0.0002441369,0.0009836204,0.0004565343,0.0003423672,0.0001276316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001603513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006621393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03763925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03727943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997988,0.00008797506,0.00001227329,0.00002186932,0.00004360646,0.00003545434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999454,0.0003203154,0.0001143059,0.00001695053,0.00006081658,0.00003380175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003628696,0.0002954389,0.6267695,0.0002530285,0.0003092304,0.0007587495,0.0002610849,0.3040905,0.001080015,0.009110339,0.001165138,0.05554421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000250685,0.0003380396,0.4421432,0.00008985175,0.0001399895,0.0003988671,0.001674517,0.5495228,0.0006758971,0.002781261,0.002153724,0.00005677986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891552,0.0003637491,0.007051541,0.0000946216,0.000005300666,0.00009619108,0.001023646,0.000009690683,0.002200129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950325,0.0002673784,0.003470145,0.000005173818,0.000003781256,0.00005851614,0.000633684,0.000001920122,0.0005268693],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03763925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07484037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1018540665794782,"score_gpt":0.2554809109276703,"score_spread":0.1536268443481921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}