{"id":"W2165578433","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.010","title":"Are natural microcosms useful model systems for ecology?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":415,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Université du Québec à Montréal; McMaster University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Microcosm; Ecology; Biodiversity; Metacommunity; Natural (archaeology); Functional ecology; Spatial ecology; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Biology; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002247836,0.0003881869,0.0009337749,0.0004059271,0.0005673159,0.001920729,0.001317923,0.0009327445,0.00158676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009749897,0.0005021134,0.0003698719,0.0005319516,0.003015835,0.006485627,0.0008443735,0.0007524564,0.0003472539],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001046956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006496632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003189155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007431393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985753,0.001039145,0.0000441159,0.0001769746,0.00009594634,0.00006842409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940119,0.003520512,0.0009017406,0.0009783546,0.0002971743,0.0002902213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001662439,0.001042268,0.1169286,0.00378473,0.001119407,0.0005674902,0.002732263,0.1278661,0.04044172,0.5453414,0.01959956,0.138914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033754,0.0008481797,0.03835349,0.0002343312,0.0003091359,0.0006117377,0.001880879,0.2344742,0.005515735,0.6792635,0.03799842,0.0001727631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8055049,0.009955601,0.1564214,0.008485159,0.0007128622,0.0003290045,0.00190766,0.0006282501,0.01605519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647879,0.003729706,0.02869184,0.0007563889,0.0001495476,0.0004460767,0.0003984107,0.00005836507,0.000981783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003189155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01188785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01523748316821887,"score_gpt":0.2566641015491386,"score_spread":0.2414266183809197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}