{"id":"W2165578433","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.010","title":"Are natural microcosms useful model systems for ecology?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":415,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Université du Québec à Montréal; McMaster University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Microcosm; Ecology; Biodiversity; Metacommunity; Natural (archaeology); Functional ecology; Spatial ecology; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Biology; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002665399,0.000161096,0.0002588175,0.0001635848,0.0002675765,0.00000687111,0.0001724857,0.0002576225,0.00005160609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006759315,0.000162703,0.00007000853,0.0002429918,0.000301507,0.0001733949,0.00007746326,0.0002007985,0.0001370625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001314684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000166304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006629687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02746928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987347,0.00005758458,0.0002975675,0.0003904035,0.00007090119,0.0004488354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994912,0.00009239066,0.0002110328,0.0001479234,0.00001856681,0.0000389434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003054024,0.0001168609,0.6057976,0.0000054431,0.00001551378,0.000002773328,0.0001533884,0.3911606,0.0001694447,0.001661292,0.0008319275,0.00005463713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001173393,0.00009155653,0.8876799,0.000005086045,0.00002120545,0.00001339186,0.0001182757,0.1023515,0.00001280672,0.008294567,0.00008866959,0.0001495941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948196,0.0001681781,0.001957632,0.0009335034,0.0008283137,0.0002885058,0.00001625565,0.0000595226,0.000928477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963728,0.00001737074,0.001147722,0.0001946704,0.0000322008,0.0003079639,0.00002888812,0.00001231085,0.001886052],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2888091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01523748316821887,"score_gpt":0.2566641015491386,"score_spread":0.2414266183809197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}