{"id":"W2165583162","doi":"10.1016/j.jcf.2006.10.003","title":"Reliability of multilocus sequence typing of the Burkholderia cepacia complex in cystic fibrosis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","topic":"Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Cardiff University; University of Oxford; University of Warwick; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Multilocus sequence typing; Housekeeping gene; Burkholderia cepacia complex; Cystic fibrosis; Genetics; Molecular epidemiology; Typing; Biology; Confidence interval; Mutation rate; Medicine; Microbiology; Genotype; Burkholderia; Gene; Internal medicine; Bacteria","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009019133,0.0004070557,0.0006557922,0.001725825,0.000611259,0.001657909,0.0007913298,0.001009806,0.0005308203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05503198,0.0004330265,0.0004829284,0.001011353,0.0009617172,0.0006871141,0.0006581073,0.001114716,0.000594769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005513576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000356664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007857116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005110552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873761,0.005587041,0.001010617,0.001666888,0.003580233,0.0007791558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9425206,0.03319751,0.005222361,0.004250244,0.01329153,0.001517738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001022882,0.00006872106,0.9635875,0.00006518938,0.0001847863,0.0001199666,0.00130825,0.000748067,0.02356854,0.00011882,0.0003365244,0.008870746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003771011,0.0004911766,0.9746166,0.00006189618,0.0002338529,0.0009078322,0.0008399075,0.005793378,0.01530083,0.0002413536,0.001437967,0.00003747465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962218,0.0007388697,0.00142479,0.0001023449,0.000063085,0.00001435466,0.0003257156,0.00001436219,0.001094735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993104,0.00005092561,0.0003693117,0.00002724128,0.0000107611,0.000002620924,0.0001317513,0.000003465098,0.00009367206],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009019133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04769832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02634466761751867,"score_gpt":0.312934425174977,"score_spread":0.2865897575574583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}