{"id":"W2165645098","doi":"10.1109/aps.2010.5561196","title":"Limitation of using absorbing boundary condition to solve the problem of scattering from a cavity in metallic screens","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Truncation (statistics); Truncation error; Computation; Boundary value problem; Boundary (topology); Context (archaeology); Scattering; Mathematical analysis; Finite element method; Field (mathematics); Mathematics; Algorithm; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Optics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001772229,0.0004186839,0.0005816472,0.0003482007,0.0005244684,0.0006091609,0.0007617272,0.001132083,0.001140207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00444189,0.0002742776,0.0005863349,0.0002528105,0.0007068659,0.001093293,0.0006707739,0.0009242403,0.0005271896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002345114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005318705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009410272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006592048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986417,0.0004187651,0.0001238008,0.00009882371,0.0006660728,0.00005081854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960801,0.002582476,0.0001808987,0.0004636093,0.0006494712,0.00004346035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002530027,0.000154078,0.004104012,0.002385349,0.0001495714,0.001249907,0.001972999,0.3847589,0.2236173,0.128888,0.003000104,0.2494669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003660734,0.0001709937,0.000757445,0.00031229,0.00006413236,0.001479194,0.0003365032,0.8610603,0.0959155,0.02428802,0.01552231,0.00005663473],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04092387,0.001539024,0.9494597,0.0003844673,0.00009732516,0.00004355067,0.00001956262,0.0002348922,0.007297727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4607983,0.003021115,0.5305814,0.0002687041,0.0001269448,0.0002010258,0.00009061836,0.000232795,0.00467913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001772229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009372532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02117088700348001,"score_gpt":0.2878401879387345,"score_spread":0.2666693009352545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}