{"id":"W2165645098","doi":"10.1109/aps.2010.5561196","title":"Limitation of using absorbing boundary condition to solve the problem of scattering from a cavity in metallic screens","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Truncation (statistics); Truncation error; Computation; Boundary value problem; Boundary (topology); Context (archaeology); Scattering; Mathematical analysis; Finite element method; Field (mathematics); Mathematics; Algorithm; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Optics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002399609,0.00006892441,0.0001398107,0.0001270359,0.0000220669,0.00001138718,0.00006742831,0.0000426113,0.00009404607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003830189,0.00005703108,0.00003264371,0.0003346746,0.00003352335,0.00007355628,0.00001576986,0.0001287148,0.00000215776],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001364659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009208448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005441103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002761607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994316,0.00002747161,0.0002493263,0.00008432499,0.00009984617,0.0001074791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999554,0.000227329,0.00004039337,0.0001134955,0.00003606022,0.0000287448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004812939,0.00001137248,0.0008026282,0.00001673752,0.00001090124,1.528515e-7,0.0003259201,0.02085092,0.9716451,0.0003236704,0.000006966328,0.006000808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005428412,0.00009936812,0.159229,0.00009444942,0.00004663866,0.000002428982,0.000238195,0.4172108,0.415064,0.006950442,0.0002752368,0.0002466925],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9192015,0.00002373547,0.07985669,0.00006341597,0.00003989173,0.0001624993,0.000003824484,0.00003015373,0.0006183118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7825423,0.000002149735,0.2173883,0.00003114668,0.00001458362,0.000004919812,0.000004339078,0.000009066322,0.00000314558],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5565811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.232566,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02117088700348001,"score_gpt":0.2878401879387345,"score_spread":0.2666693009352545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}