{"id":"W2165677104","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.50.3.331","title":"If the Supreme Court Were on Facebook: Evaluating the Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Test from a Social Perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Dignity; Autonomy; Expectation of privacy; Test (biology); Right to privacy; Position (finance); Perspective (graphical); Law; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Privacy laws of the United States; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Business; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0712354,0.0004677516,0.001189928,0.003358431,0.02913499,0.02294254,0.004087167,0.01645318,0.004725769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.274075,0.0005397152,0.001282832,0.003718352,0.03698367,0.01034267,0.008679345,0.01655382,0.0005515763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04837082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05512577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4086165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3943153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9069101,0.03566593,0.004017199,0.004707601,0.03589316,0.0128061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6422927,0.2822674,0.02139634,0.005767956,0.03750018,0.01077546],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067342,0.0007528053,0.1267838,0.0001948207,0.0002210549,0.00319673,0.07835267,0.001707024,0.0005893962,0.7172805,0.02701399,0.04323369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006133811,0.001459613,0.223215,0.002268479,0.001034434,0.001063819,0.2599038,0.01421125,0.003887194,0.3546802,0.1367676,0.0008953627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6514257,0.002236974,0.003156024,0.1373019,0.0006680746,0.000370109,0.00025339,0.00002893157,0.204559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880426,0.0002481287,0.0005263866,0.009168342,0.0001480165,0.0001167936,0.00003475736,0.00001081794,0.001704199],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5913835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8124762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1727131079971769,"score_gpt":0.3616413969878192,"score_spread":0.1889282889906423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}