{"id":"W2165677104","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.50.3.331","title":"If the Supreme Court Were on Facebook: Evaluating the Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Test from a Social Perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Dignity; Autonomy; Expectation of privacy; Test (biology); Right to privacy; Position (finance); Perspective (graphical); Law; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Privacy laws of the United States; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Business; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002628274,0.0002905899,0.0004644039,0.000307017,0.002597643,0.0001051958,0.001239519,0.0004251733,0.0001480749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02464212,0.0002381691,0.0001585036,0.0001547481,0.002230506,0.0003497275,0.00009433105,0.001310419,0.00000714115],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001323278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005871656,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1175802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1198887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99625,0.001420561,0.0005865286,0.000381145,0.0002613424,0.00110037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935595,0.003823883,0.0006866116,0.0003990539,0.000927097,0.0006037947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006627219,0.0001498429,0.002113375,0.0003883338,0.0002305893,0.001122709,0.8030685,0.0002584768,0.001434789,0.1746297,0.00652505,0.00941597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009616761,0.00127071,0.0755975,0.0002013302,0.00490847,0.001415313,0.8851077,0.0004011001,0.0003573916,0.02382343,0.00553897,0.0004164184],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743,0.001042191,0.0006429229,0.01823954,0.0005131343,0.0004319318,0.0000923308,0.00002145408,0.004716545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960898,0.0007827607,0.0008283542,0.001097514,0.0009894752,0.00003761628,0.0000091803,0.00002518326,0.0001401638],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1508062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1727131079971769,"score_gpt":0.3616413969878192,"score_spread":0.1889282889906423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}