{"id":"W2165760152","doi":"10.1558/jmea.v27i2.187","title":"Function and Use of Roman Pottery: A Quantitative Method for Assessing Use-Wear","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology","topic":"Archaeology and ancient environmental studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pottery; Ceramic; Archaeology; Attrition; Function (biology); Consumption (sociology); Computer science; History; Art; Materials science; Aesthetics; Metallurgy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005740958,0.0007031176,0.0004661106,0.00738361,0.0011748,0.00151003,0.001146016,0.0007882618,0.004599689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01776856,0.000465351,0.0006802463,0.007108198,0.00280907,0.001353594,0.002603729,0.0007739677,0.000708761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007849468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005520199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001705157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003530829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924139,0.003986714,0.0008136919,0.000745405,0.001810609,0.0002295349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882243,0.00608611,0.001764963,0.001721104,0.001933885,0.0002696718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00111387,0.0007595242,0.5026309,0.002784836,0.0003736415,0.001265553,0.1553256,0.00308166,0.03593481,0.02116426,0.007048346,0.2685169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008236192,0.0009767135,0.8469411,0.0004878533,0.0001087258,0.001985082,0.06677827,0.009019354,0.01356587,0.009294329,0.05052603,0.0002342955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.8527468,0.00074366,0.09550531,0.0002546764,0.00009984061,0.002703811,0.003684784,0.0001883524,0.04407287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8659692,0.0003858067,0.1226469,0.0001135323,0.00006993808,0.005432616,0.001526163,0.0001089893,0.003746949],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00738361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03036141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05885216186950575,"score_gpt":0.2881947923681461,"score_spread":0.2293426304986403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}