{"id":"W2165784008","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00277.x","title":"Welfare‐ranking ad valorem and specific tariffs under monopolistic competition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monopolistic competition; Ad valorem tax; Tariff; Economics; Ranking (information retrieval); Welfare; Competition (biology); Microeconomics; Consumer welfare; International economics; Monopoly; Public economics; Market economy; Computer science; Tax reform","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00290459,0.0006428932,0.001092479,0.001234902,0.0007160863,0.003096644,0.0006807356,0.001440739,0.008267605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00638721,0.0002699503,0.0005436567,0.001331877,0.002751903,0.00256322,0.001061336,0.001367624,0.0005074585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002375686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001459409,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001973689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003321561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983792,0.0008534129,0.00005941898,0.0001635296,0.0002928656,0.0002514971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947757,0.003186668,0.0007239641,0.0004916589,0.000410439,0.0004115632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005039811,0.0003581845,0.005985903,0.0002941538,0.0001199737,0.0002019025,0.0001748189,0.09821817,0.004132893,0.8372032,0.005098283,0.04770852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001592051,0.0005582289,0.006089683,0.00007927426,0.00007623251,0.0003474608,0.0003943281,0.1616833,0.001379477,0.8251668,0.004007456,0.00005862378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8452404,0.000642547,0.0601663,0.001777028,0.00006124327,0.0000856887,0.0003537746,0.00007489927,0.09159812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927334,0.0001752446,0.00414604,0.00008789996,0.00002390124,0.00002347752,0.00007503969,0.000011586,0.002723372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008267605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02765793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2074894420236321,"score_gpt":0.173228840114879,"score_spread":0.03426060190875307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}