{"id":"W2165812771","doi":"10.4319/lo.2009.54.5.1475","title":"Assessing the applicability of Emiliania huxleyi coccolith morphology as a sea‐surface salinity proxy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Limnology and Oceanography","topic":"Marine and coastal ecosystems","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coccolith; Emiliania huxleyi; Salinity; Coccolithophore; Oceanography; Paleoceanography; Biology; Phytoplankton; Geology; Carbonate; Ecology; Nutrient; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008205172,0.0005655646,0.0004295709,0.0005114502,0.0002677107,0.0006977401,0.0004597468,0.0005196913,0.0007880612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002035497,0.0002373459,0.0002836039,0.0004928814,0.0004193218,0.0005962879,0.0008223683,0.0005227273,0.000245664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004277024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002070693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003823058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006908852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994488,0.0001491568,0.00007021559,0.0001395341,0.0001372895,0.00005498569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988043,0.0004312555,0.0002605277,0.0001445447,0.0002682525,0.00009113368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006128323,0.0002131701,0.2466266,0.0001530971,0.0001032696,0.0001713378,0.0003046921,0.001104419,0.7285818,0.0001384093,0.00008467266,0.02190573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002266052,0.002396468,0.8425992,0.00002612138,0.00009535449,0.000192161,0.0006418976,0.005033942,0.1477984,0.0001207971,0.001044148,0.00002897097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972035,0.0001941002,0.001189589,0.00002873529,0.000008429207,0.00003197321,0.0002256647,0.000007434026,0.001110635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957769,0.0001911146,0.002948778,0.0000406445,0.000006555256,0.00004993765,0.0004260805,0.00000415866,0.0005558638],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003823058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007601619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01043867689867168,"score_gpt":0.2415151172827898,"score_spread":0.2310764403841181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}