{"id":"W2165815624","doi":"10.1017/s0007087406229054","title":"L<scp>ONDA</scp> S<scp>CHIEBINGER</scp> and C<scp>LAUDIA</scp> S<scp>WAN</scp> (eds.), <b>Colonial Botany: Science, Commerce, and Politics in the Early Modern World.</b> Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004. Pp. vi+346. ISBN 0-8122-3827-3. £36.00, $55.00 (hardback).","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The British Journal for the History of Science","topic":"Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Politics; Political science; History; Archaeology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00566616,0.0004103194,0.0007939474,0.0005472598,0.003921561,0.0008691833,0.002919402,0.0001925077,0.000008213604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001178339,0.000404668,0.0002965328,0.0009361106,0.00781625,0.001591089,0.0004406278,0.0009353606,0.00001533703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007828578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005026453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006216229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009145568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961981,0.0001294466,0.001112524,0.0008501641,0.0005047254,0.001205012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946458,0.002252363,0.001729032,0.0006847531,0.0003843584,0.0003037268],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007302099,0.001487293,0.06057725,0.0003861855,0.0003659984,0.000120967,0.06274804,0.004192222,0.003616478,0.07710527,0.7820179,0.00730941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002179362,0.0002464781,0.171156,0.0001692434,0.0001068367,0.0003998578,0.004940248,0.01053486,0.00008147873,0.02927767,0.780764,0.0001440271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9110792,0.07823405,0.0002863244,0.0006590333,0.001171079,0.0006932169,0.0002630355,0.00002857298,0.007585428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739294,0.01118316,0.0006389382,0.0006022154,0.0004510174,0.00001508068,0.000006116598,0.00006481405,0.01310924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1105787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02037453616719965,"score_gpt":0.2025808141241839,"score_spread":0.1822062779569842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}