{"id":"W2165903616","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00915.x","title":"Comparing tropical forest tree size distributions with the predictions of metabolic ecology and equilibrium models","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Physiological and biochemical adaptations","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":214,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Tropical forest; Tree (set theory); Biology; Environmental science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002120863,0.0002050585,0.0003014561,0.0005047033,0.0003373255,0.0008981071,0.00104884,0.0009086216,0.002366498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02398553,0.0001174533,0.0001680553,0.0009275462,0.0007549784,0.001320712,0.0005758464,0.0007913336,0.0006444191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001515459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002373495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002435336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002250784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991497,0.0004195999,0.00003675427,0.0001323197,0.000195026,0.00006665489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880252,0.009665011,0.0006165142,0.000755691,0.0007684187,0.0001691645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002556151,0.0002064079,0.2391701,0.0004130448,0.0002505979,0.002991908,0.00128976,0.2553135,0.02231156,0.1781651,0.06213194,0.2351999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001275618,0.0001253028,0.05321079,0.00004881392,0.00002549714,0.001756779,0.0004778747,0.7450104,0.003927094,0.1871656,0.00806593,0.00005841276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8778909,0.001440772,0.07018127,0.02688791,0.0002930763,0.0000267645,0.0009105469,0.0003946705,0.02197413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921798,0.0004318669,0.003945352,0.002179333,0.0002585515,0.00002626293,0.000350171,0.00005593078,0.0005727749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002435336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01121634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.013362251501135,"score_gpt":0.1902678989163174,"score_spread":0.1769056474151824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}