{"id":"W2165912914","doi":"10.1186/1478-4505-7-s1-s16","title":"SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 16: Using research evidence in balancing the pros and cons of policies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Research Policy and Systems","topic":"Primary Care and Health Outcomes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid; Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research; European Commission","keywords":"Health services research; Health administration; Health policy; Balance (ability); Public economics; cons; Health economics; Social policy; Public health; Evidence-based practice; Outcome (game theory); Public relations; Actuarial science; Management science; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Economics; Nursing; Alternative medicine; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05584632,0.0002756926,0.001177085,0.001673742,0.004461597,0.0001834556,0.0005217883,0.0002986811,0.000009955159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02732314,0.0002003247,0.00007526453,0.001956181,0.000625836,0.0008661169,0.0003720225,0.002107005,0.000006714226],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005115477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04506078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1527441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01145487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9836752,0.007680003,0.002428088,0.0006023082,0.001663517,0.003950871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601854,0.03598633,0.0007090182,0.0007891566,0.001366092,0.0009639959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001854732,0.0002171652,0.1228338,0.09014157,0.00007002689,0.00001477724,0.2054966,0.00003376747,0.0007556773,0.2852763,0.2122455,0.08106007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00697261,0.01261551,0.389234,0.0801484,0.00002287056,0.0002395434,0.1961093,0.003685815,0.00007236772,0.01289543,0.2967252,0.001278947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3522814,0.04853586,0.0002111928,0.567512,0.0005375411,0.02593422,0.0002523451,0.0001135434,0.004621919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593102,0.01872234,0.0001700055,0.01914168,0.001138345,0.0006830082,0.000008541215,0.00003407483,0.00079183],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6070288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8215434041920318,"score_gpt":0.7034141160461105,"score_spread":0.1181292881459213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}