{"id":"W2166062840","doi":"10.1103/physreva.83.022301","title":"Practical private database queries based on a quantum-key-distribution protocol","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review A","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":228,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Quantum key distribution; Protocol (science); Private information retrieval; Element (criminal law); Key (lock); Database security; Key distribution; Database; Scope (computer science); Computer security; Limiting; Quantum; Public-key cryptography; Theoretical computer science; Encryption; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003607595,0.0001753579,0.0002518833,0.00003835381,0.00009443564,0.00006456541,0.0004294075,0.00002153434,0.00006803773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003110565,0.0001289487,0.000169634,0.0005817884,0.0000732098,0.0009335066,0.0001122743,0.0002034745,0.0004842733],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002182739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009280619,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004746867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.391848e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985843,0.0001538716,0.0003131239,0.0002757045,0.0004208208,0.0002521708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987085,0.00009713125,0.0001900207,0.0007523145,0.00009553087,0.0001565336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002635594,0.0004461026,0.00002226845,0.0006053627,0.000004800711,0.000005746756,0.00005895898,3.410408e-7,0.00003013497,0.9896707,0.005155296,0.003973943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001170483,0.001199451,0.001877653,0.003130259,0.00005121657,0.00001693918,0.00000931209,0.2554041,0.005272442,0.03848517,0.6925799,0.0008030995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003168527,0.0000424284,0.9657301,0.002315241,0.00006903151,0.02518195,0.00002198501,0.0003331004,0.005989323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5375345,0.0005513449,0.1498007,0.03937655,0.0004106381,0.2719053,0.0003248889,0.00007397355,0.00002211118],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9511855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6224515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0673414146112939,"score_gpt":0.3613773751238588,"score_spread":0.2940359605125649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}