{"id":"W2166069557","doi":"10.1111/ele.12118","title":"Trophic complementarity drives the biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationship in food webs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Trophic level; Complementarity (molecular biology); Ecology; Ecosystem; Species richness; Biodiversity; Ecological network; Trophic cascade; Food web; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001037253,0.00006738846,0.00009170413,0.00001080471,0.0004791064,0.00003047632,0.0001291111,0.00003448808,0.0004200945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001798912,0.00002378479,0.00003874107,0.0001227653,0.00005390766,0.00008158066,0.00006464948,0.0001186816,0.0002970642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003461712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001289087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002846594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04986479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994171,0.00009834394,0.0001075222,0.0001337473,0.00005391338,0.00018941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995714,0.0003386008,0.00004529012,0.00001419856,0.00001077614,0.00001968266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003244147,0.00001294275,0.9876973,9.686333e-7,0.00001314634,0.000001710912,0.00006098138,0.00000344498,0.004922596,0.00007806522,0.0071091,0.00009649516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009152422,0.00009410842,0.9958017,0.000002607452,0.000004885038,0.00000286833,0.0004942518,0.00001481503,0.00001773147,0.00009521627,0.003319582,0.00006073262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571294,0.00002020384,3.834828e-7,0.04239378,0.00009467842,0.0001678473,0.00001992322,0.00002494477,0.0001488287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979749,0.000004030097,0.000009830199,0.0018846,0.00007132816,0.00001795211,0.00001738989,1.728402e-7,0.00001981647],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04958013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9674727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04985406280894916,"score_gpt":0.1817039930572412,"score_spread":0.131849930248292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}