{"id":"W2166098799","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01475.x","title":"The electronic Cumulative Illness Rating Scale: a reliable and valid tool to assess multi-morbidity in primary care","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Chronic Disease Management Strategies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Chicoutimi; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada; Pfizer Canada","keywords":"Medicine; Concomitant; Rating scale; Reliability (semiconductor); Primary care; Physical therapy; Family medicine; Psychology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01953491,0.0001181704,0.0003424711,0.000123382,0.0001078325,0.0001099064,0.0001239087,0.0001057058,0.00004838065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03547547,0.00008616276,0.00008287867,0.0003282947,0.00008622946,0.0007522723,0.00008748527,0.001498797,0.000006145988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004567766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001566146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005122825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004402692,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965068,0.0007042054,0.001361682,0.0002316083,0.0009496722,0.0002460983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927742,0.004800724,0.0008664433,0.0002720935,0.001171566,0.0001149404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01605814,0.005978941,0.6100503,0.001304192,0.000767958,0.000513578,0.007174835,0.01568288,0.002297306,0.004454405,0.006163848,0.3295537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009042604,0.0007149795,0.953611,0.0003801477,0.0005760823,0.0000833416,0.006475486,0.01396766,0.00004102129,0.0009882647,0.0139359,0.0001835516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873515,0.0005268962,0.0003488688,0.005422737,0.0007102713,0.0009433227,9.315431e-7,0.000006883085,0.004688634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930285,0.000429099,0.005276723,0.0008351756,0.0003146683,0.00002844495,0.000004298953,0.00001332277,0.00006982182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3435607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9726492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1515119122453204,"score_gpt":0.5236701227061642,"score_spread":0.3721582104608439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}