{"id":"W2166099324","doi":"10.1109/re.2005.19","title":"Configuring common personal software: a requirements-driven approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Personalization; Computer science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Construct (python library); Software; Configuration Management (ITSM); Software configuration management; Overlay; Human–computer interaction; Software system; Software engineering; World Wide Web; Software construction; Programming language; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006915644,0.001065101,0.0007411332,0.002514692,0.001327177,0.004365054,0.003774691,0.002094666,0.001742005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0187134,0.001442112,0.001361714,0.001749423,0.003172374,0.005100101,0.002570023,0.001707722,0.0004406388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002635677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002115047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003215566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005797421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906308,0.004402299,0.0004394189,0.000907386,0.002988541,0.0006314996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986603,0.006731737,0.001210338,0.003336958,0.001563204,0.0005547527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003467169,0.0008031685,0.02193106,0.001224203,0.0003179386,0.004133614,0.01455119,0.3520662,0.04055244,0.2912602,0.004056972,0.2687564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006154653,0.0003238427,0.004848153,0.0003852654,0.0001280802,0.002278845,0.007892334,0.7664429,0.0300768,0.1606011,0.02677382,0.0001872894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1150161,0.0001717596,0.8717632,0.0008337196,0.000011403,0.0005116741,0.0001088518,0.000740807,0.01084269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4663788,0.0001783681,0.5310174,0.0001039835,0.00001022259,0.0002952253,0.0002557183,0.0001780899,0.001582217],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006915644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03657389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06179561243303505,"score_gpt":0.3037081872259737,"score_spread":0.2419125747929387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}