{"id":"W2166116338","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00201.x","title":"Alternative methods for environmentally adjusted productivity analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Productivity; Productivity model; Nonparametric statistics; Agricultural productivity; Production (economics); Strengths and weaknesses; Econometrics; Economics; Environmental economics; Index (typography); Agriculture; Computer science; Microeconomics; Total factor productivity; Macroeconomics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002991842,0.0002119754,0.0005667073,0.0002997313,0.000243145,0.0002910504,0.0008811003,0.00007536086,0.0002460258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001113502,0.0001321563,0.0006054804,0.001431954,0.0001090383,0.0005687084,0.0001530693,0.0000991798,0.0001473625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002255634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002264512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001195229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004187363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975575,0.0002377645,0.0007183573,0.0009303635,0.0002342899,0.0003217532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972389,0.001356093,0.0005301549,0.0005930298,0.0001675005,0.0001143055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000151979,0.0005951087,0.05205253,0.000005047502,0.00330633,0.000003982474,0.001552206,0.6316298,0.01881273,0.00823853,0.003194427,0.2804574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009993076,0.0002329819,0.4912815,0.000005091656,0.002236889,0.00003874431,0.002544383,0.3649124,0.01909454,0.03269348,0.08468921,0.001271494],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9028796,0.00007706276,0.0933839,0.001576679,0.0002534898,0.0002958865,0.0000252361,0.00003006074,0.001478107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593638,0.00004381447,0.03615783,0.0001650533,0.0001764399,0.00003648203,0.00004769039,0.000008212821,0.004000706],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.439229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5389178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08925002270392976,"score_gpt":0.3848800168183462,"score_spread":0.2956299941144164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}