{"id":"W2166116338","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00201.x","title":"Alternative methods for environmentally adjusted productivity analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Productivity; Productivity model; Nonparametric statistics; Agricultural productivity; Production (economics); Strengths and weaknesses; Econometrics; Economics; Environmental economics; Index (typography); Agriculture; Computer science; Microeconomics; Total factor productivity; Macroeconomics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01405977,0.001123778,0.001085794,0.006296283,0.000497419,0.002365569,0.001950969,0.001176156,0.005776206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06195977,0.000377252,0.001569935,0.005386386,0.001323889,0.002635486,0.002047708,0.002028741,0.0007915997],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002316281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001754889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003761652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002919886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897237,0.006609877,0.0004383538,0.0007867204,0.002186304,0.0002551089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966174,0.02747024,0.001385241,0.00237734,0.002450547,0.0001426053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000930669,0.0001679693,0.005259223,0.0002419614,0.0002722837,0.00006155642,0.0001725115,0.3938173,0.0006694659,0.3398688,0.001626811,0.2577492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002328739,0.00003778169,0.002279972,0.00005275564,0.00002321275,0.00004639136,0.00008109314,0.7958416,0.0006120788,0.1950019,0.005963983,0.00003596812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004092209,0.0001588932,0.9938618,0.00006462673,0.00002221402,0.00005679862,0.0001276067,0.00009769799,0.001518141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2293263,0.0004977098,0.7647945,0.00007860103,0.00009137935,0.0007975769,0.0007164814,0.0001637166,0.00353371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01405977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07435602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08925002270392976,"score_gpt":0.3848800168183462,"score_spread":0.2956299941144164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}