{"id":"W2166123946","doi":"10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.02.004","title":"Evaluating the use of testate amoebae for palaeohydrological reconstruction in permafrost peatlands","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology","topic":"Climate change and permafrost","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Geological Survey of Canada; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Permafrost; Peat; Testate amoebae; Geology; Physical geography; Earth science; Archaeology; Oceanography; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001971268,0.000471748,0.0009565996,0.0006447089,0.0002774671,0.00006358993,0.0005442778,0.0005064228,0.000902064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001048699,0.0003405694,0.0003580954,0.0009898792,0.001229392,0.0003342206,0.0000768927,0.0004809435,0.00005370251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001686748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001535109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001182495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0302001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955198,0.0009208383,0.001197664,0.0008150103,0.00035196,0.001194722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942243,0.003992302,0.0005724911,0.0005861318,0.0003478387,0.0002769065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006262353,0.00008882816,0.9874888,0.0000542597,0.00006228562,0.00003042404,0.0007004039,0.002806392,0.0001743801,0.0001341773,0.0004110666,0.007422759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002771657,0.001747511,0.9410117,0.00003730758,0.0001140566,0.0005208181,0.0007555833,0.04664291,0.0000427593,0.003037725,0.002874446,0.000443511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916229,0.0007012582,0.00009335425,0.001257015,0.001432504,0.00118348,0.003187372,0.00007536358,0.000446745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916986,0.000390804,0.00254249,0.0006986817,0.0001586878,0.0001337514,0.004324643,0.00002092518,0.00003141805],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04647708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2362385444688471,"score_gpt":0.3389009960969962,"score_spread":0.1026624516281491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}