{"id":"W2166144637","doi":"10.1002/cjg2.489","title":"A Study on Reconstruction of De‐Aliased Uneven Seismic Data","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of Geophysics","topic":"Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Regularization (linguistics); Algorithm; Interpolation (computer graphics); Inverse problem; Conjugate gradient method; Weighting; Seismic inversion; Synthetic data; Computer science; Norm (philosophy); Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Azimuth; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007800589,0.0002533324,0.0002753206,0.0003110165,0.000138684,0.0003564998,0.0002813543,0.0003222874,0.0006335612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002495493,0.0001421548,0.0002282112,0.0004296573,0.0003292362,0.0006224699,0.0003245785,0.0002967827,0.0000937181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001302477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000240453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001248763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000723084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997649,0.00006727919,0.00001137129,0.00003471645,0.0001000554,0.00002175247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992741,0.0004072069,0.00005568685,0.0001002507,0.0001404238,0.00002241441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007543788,0.0001067806,0.01103206,0.0004150622,0.0001111821,0.001354402,0.0006259396,0.5562097,0.1939867,0.02835344,0.0008579835,0.2061925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006825465,0.00004221177,0.0009004513,0.000007007367,0.000007456642,0.0001360182,0.00004503188,0.9812175,0.01587423,0.001059873,0.0006986787,0.000004633915],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3432012,0.0002349701,0.6550241,0.0001037776,0.00001718688,0.00001587891,0.00002829204,0.0001143664,0.001260269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8691521,0.0003595961,0.1290693,0.00002611106,0.00001412921,0.00001524661,0.0001017323,0.00004557947,0.001216275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001248763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004125416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02703077146440713,"score_gpt":0.2674146449718848,"score_spread":0.2403838735074777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}