{"id":"W2166165129","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2010.14.4.361","title":"Doubting What the Elders Have to Say: A Critical Examination of Canadian Judicial Treatment of Aboriginal Oral History Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Oral history; Notice; Law; Mandate; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Objectivity (philosophy); Rules of evidence; Judicial review; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Common law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003883134,0.0001263894,0.0002366772,0.0003453821,0.0002243463,0.0001382561,0.001305971,0.00007157836,0.0002944976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004802908,0.00007409984,0.0001659124,0.0002332183,0.0007996398,0.001600787,0.00003664668,0.0002704628,0.000006087587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008831605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002331205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.135381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3429534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997169,0.0003192989,0.000607924,0.0001542949,0.001478908,0.0002705939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949889,0.002231904,0.0004809237,0.0002017641,0.001882219,0.0002143098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001982638,0.0006359358,0.0132334,0.00009288182,0.0004231268,0.0002938438,0.2639153,0.0004673163,0.05691799,0.158937,0.01276061,0.49034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001277738,0.004900917,0.05831066,0.0131077,0.001034364,0.0005423034,0.07355303,0.0005566609,0.04418619,0.01238487,0.7891505,0.0009950147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7945558,0.004397077,0.0003018198,0.1942216,0.004626565,0.0004670103,0.000004809601,0.000007204389,0.001418075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963145,0.001474824,0.0004889459,0.0005119825,0.0009442363,0.00001035377,2.428739e-7,0.000007394865,0.0002474885],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.77639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8703766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2006508127194054,"score_gpt":0.4318830265874217,"score_spread":0.2312322138680164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}