{"id":"W2166219954","doi":"10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000595","title":"Comparison of the Power of Lognormality Tests with Different Right-Tail Alternative Distributions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrologic Engineering","topic":"Hydrology and Drought Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Quantile; Log-normal distribution; Skewness; Normality; Mathematics; Goodness of fit; Monte Carlo method; Statistics; Frequency distribution; Statistical hypothesis testing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003190394,0.0001012621,0.0003036121,0.00003290268,0.00004413704,0.000002390973,0.0002475236,0.00005465957,0.0003038397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007483275,0.00005145033,0.0001257888,0.0001737384,0.0001513086,0.0001462704,0.00008511197,0.0002483035,0.00000250309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005714084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000434106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001585195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009988696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990746,0.00005535013,0.0003740799,0.00006123856,0.0002464223,0.0001883284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992424,0.0001038634,0.0004206384,0.0001471994,0.00001851614,0.00006734044],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001858288,0.000196945,0.8488014,0.000004292414,0.00008078424,0.000001893631,0.0002829834,0.1459574,0.004480454,0.0001191125,0.00003788387,0.00001829852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002894976,0.0002960379,0.9456627,0.00002386692,0.0001512848,0.00005302512,0.00003482185,0.01269459,0.04025405,0.0001543932,0.0002883921,0.00009729489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922476,0.0001471357,0.006867204,0.0001225041,0.0001054786,0.00003932767,0.000004298386,0.000003943351,0.0004624918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996654,0.000005135697,0.0002765988,0.00001197027,0.00002485427,9.894895e-7,5.936772e-7,0.000003394193,0.00001108512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1332628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3326832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01079643796929256,"score_gpt":0.2447169914879426,"score_spread":0.2339205535186501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}