{"id":"W2166282462","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00527.x","title":"Cue‐ versus response‐locked processes in backward inhibition: Evidence from ERPs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychophysiology","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Jewish General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Response inhibition; Task (project management); Negativity effect; Event-related potential; Set (abstract data type); Cognitive psychology; Electrophysiology; Selective attention; Task switching; Inhibitory control; Electroencephalography; Neuroscience; Cognition; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002530571,0.0002387926,0.0003120392,0.0001618106,0.000136416,0.00001510243,0.0003081871,0.0001590802,0.0001493464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001202484,0.0002027797,0.00006351825,0.0007807952,0.0004523015,0.0002595778,0.0001029271,0.0003446181,0.0005489251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004520486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000364509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005872334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001638701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997792,0.0002712304,0.0003424531,0.0008796672,0.0001826608,0.0005319872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969068,0.002474996,0.0001205142,0.0003526587,0.00005809433,0.00008695935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01322072,0.0001677421,0.001619711,0.000008625191,0.000003169331,0.0001558584,0.000288446,0.000001983662,0.9809222,0.000002964923,0.001840089,0.001768487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002144911,0.0009600867,0.07617123,0.00009665704,0.00001265243,0.00001347572,0.0001417461,0.000001602804,0.9156421,0.001613352,0.002859167,0.0003430109],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940286,0.0002804974,0.00001478657,0.0028987,0.00192914,0.0002393871,0.00001826151,0.0001115895,0.0004790992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973128,0.0002936678,0.0001278266,0.001687734,0.0002447608,0.00004083849,0.000003530474,0.0000168149,0.0002720404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07455152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8269115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2253328257632425,"score_gpt":0.4260995950713244,"score_spread":0.2007667693080819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}