{"id":"W2166282462","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00527.x","title":"Cue‐ versus response‐locked processes in backward inhibition: Evidence from ERPs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychophysiology","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Jewish General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Response inhibition; Task (project management); Negativity effect; Event-related potential; Set (abstract data type); Cognitive psychology; Electrophysiology; Selective attention; Task switching; Inhibitory control; Electroencephalography; Neuroscience; Cognition; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006245697,0.0005113552,0.0003506989,0.0003107337,0.000138262,0.0003984352,0.0002944073,0.0003549104,0.001682753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004279661,0.0002510867,0.0001441433,0.0002170012,0.0004042444,0.0004618711,0.0005132112,0.0006634659,0.0003275106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000155673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002310123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006395367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004878643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997013,0.00004328056,0.00002344025,0.00006072023,0.0001089045,0.00006225046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981425,0.0009009225,0.0004494303,0.0001666472,0.0001638689,0.000176676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00134929,0.0001004463,0.00294484,0.00008064272,0.00001270934,0.00006856825,0.0001419468,0.00007222145,0.9890322,0.0001907044,0.00003589313,0.005970594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002023606,0.0015543,0.689404,0.00002820415,0.0001102347,0.001068968,0.0001688602,0.003201763,0.3014036,0.001882649,0.0009304619,0.00004456512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915283,0.0001765358,0.005686479,0.00003048268,0.00001090562,0.00002681829,0.0001325483,0.00006916947,0.002338703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961654,0.0001165542,0.002641047,0.00006261017,0.00001210128,0.00005941412,0.0002014386,0.00006753008,0.0006738993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001682753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005629361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2253328257632425,"score_gpt":0.4260995950713244,"score_spread":0.2007667693080819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}