{"id":"W2166295867","doi":"10.1139/f10-051","title":"Detecting and correcting underreported catches in fish stock assessment: trial of a new method","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Census and Population Estimation","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Gadus; Stock (firearms); Overfishing; Stock assessment; Fishery; Atlantic cod; Population; Econometrics; Environmental science; Statistics; Geography; Fishing; Mathematics; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04254153,0.001063409,0.001667396,0.001149044,0.0005502155,0.001290212,0.002517012,0.00189951,0.001119074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1080823,0.0006489021,0.001056392,0.001056619,0.001623835,0.003301793,0.002337094,0.00265906,0.0002885498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000960545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001882271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008114336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00793311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9816887,0.0132454,0.0006747918,0.001914202,0.002309722,0.0001671553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8249874,0.1521525,0.00490503,0.009921217,0.007314809,0.0007191115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003115108,0.000558517,0.06092882,0.0004657423,0.002310224,0.0002118239,0.00109996,0.2433337,0.006144291,0.01533683,0.003164902,0.6633301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002671463,0.0006838181,0.004732845,0.00005303743,0.0002209187,0.0001712554,0.00006108449,0.9846621,0.001703186,0.006247588,0.001107326,0.00008964114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07144712,0.0005158391,0.9253049,0.000884886,0.0002694287,0.0001956549,0.0001066535,0.0006356236,0.0006398613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3397987,0.0002924146,0.6575739,0.0004472156,0.0001993868,0.0003557499,0.0001318241,0.0001618967,0.00103893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04254153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2249838,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.112978788042474,"score_gpt":0.37854112766773,"score_spread":0.265562339625256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}