{"id":"W2166295867","doi":"10.1139/f10-051","title":"Detecting and correcting underreported catches in fish stock assessment: trial of a new method","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Census and Population Estimation","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Gadus; Stock (firearms); Overfishing; Stock assessment; Fishery; Atlantic cod; Population; Econometrics; Environmental science; Statistics; Geography; Fishing; Mathematics; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001585128,0.00005921998,0.0001906209,0.000164994,0.0001481579,0.00009079601,0.0000657575,0.0000388065,0.00002102612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002015394,0.0000486668,0.00002253915,0.0002137447,0.0001211679,0.0002101318,0.000005697362,0.0001457498,3.883314e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008040142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01294496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2278906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991944,0.00004400771,0.0004274976,0.00007798796,0.0001373929,0.0001187394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987659,0.0005341519,0.0004580945,0.00004697946,0.00003492632,0.000159883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001091399,0.00002330134,0.6388809,0.00006584354,0.00002471316,0.00001810815,0.01154844,0.00004041523,0.000383753,0.001658284,0.0005397564,0.3467073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01670981,0.001902452,0.5487561,0.0007597167,0.0001800148,0.001440096,0.02525638,0.1020108,0.0008753359,0.3002933,0.001145018,0.0006709566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944919,0.00001761512,0.003778149,0.0009216545,0.000357269,0.00009102637,8.680277e-7,0.000001644038,0.0003399057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9441968,0.000002132045,0.05569599,0.00002325325,0.00005606032,4.966956e-7,1.653091e-7,0.000003008302,0.00002208432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3460364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936279,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.112978788042474,"score_gpt":0.37854112766773,"score_spread":0.265562339625256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}