{"id":"W2166338700","doi":"10.1139/z2012-002","title":"Assessment of the status and viability of a population of moose (<i>Alces alces</i>) at its southern range limit in Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources; Northwestern University","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Biology; Metapopulation; Population; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Population decline; Climate change; Population size; Population growth; Habitat; Demography; Biological dispersal","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002485223,0.00009563252,0.0001506725,0.0004057159,0.001060117,0.0004777425,0.0003240161,0.0001278186,0.0005489002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007985606,0.00009115419,0.0001273829,0.0003972924,0.0005304074,0.000207214,0.0003291201,0.000150856,0.00007701887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003989026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002349321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8490494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9421897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998748,0.00001419236,0.000005763838,0.00003191625,0.00003911836,0.00003420562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993607,0.00006605937,0.0001695158,0.00002737639,0.0002315966,0.0001446704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005753368,0.000008562301,0.9920427,0.000007694179,0.00001665733,0.00008857605,0.001690949,0.0001419201,0.003146709,0.00006584397,0.00007882845,0.002653996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001018504,0.00001968628,0.9987238,0.00000222045,0.000005181109,0.00003533174,0.0007172643,0.0001916351,0.00009007446,0.00001620256,0.0001953492,0.000002143912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996052,0.00001717576,0.00002502397,0.000008553553,2.667824e-7,0.000001364902,0.0000371151,6.352416e-7,0.000304668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996634,0.00002226261,0.00005290823,0.000004205421,4.752039e-7,0.000001589005,0.00006846129,4.49318e-7,0.0001863526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1509506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.303679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01418558797307501,"score_gpt":0.2149441731242899,"score_spread":0.2007585851512149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}