{"id":"W2166406271","doi":"10.1016/j.jat.2004.02.006","title":"Finding best approximation pairs relative to two closed convex sets in Hilbert spaces","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Approximation Theory","topic":"Numerical methods in inverse problems","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":210,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Pacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences; Simon Fraser University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Hilbert space; Monotone polygon; Regular polygon; Space (punctuation); Product (mathematics); Zero (linguistics); Subderivative; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Convex optimization; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004585347,0.0002518558,0.0005800183,0.0005943056,0.00009755499,0.0000738111,0.0003160063,0.0001220426,0.0001259288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00437043,0.0002161599,0.0001683125,0.0006805611,0.0001027725,0.0008378522,0.00007136878,0.0005936276,0.00006448273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005468834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001208628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008637649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005593165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968662,0.0007478484,0.001222813,0.000236319,0.0006063271,0.000320555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962955,0.001750556,0.001234455,0.0002687806,0.0002797679,0.0001709788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003447315,0.0004926545,0.0002303036,0.0002100812,0.0001091066,0.00002566552,0.01565773,0.003426525,0.004095302,0.9613706,0.0002163445,0.01382088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002009719,0.0002229127,0.0000868639,0.0006308139,0.00006191622,0.00006485412,0.002573393,0.001184881,0.01055742,0.9821557,0.0002103847,0.0002410796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2455428,0.00007267245,0.7422913,0.002233015,0.0004854046,0.000794835,0.000004308141,0.00004962711,0.008526031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3948325,0.0000081356,0.6046528,0.0002142853,0.0001036622,0.00002263006,0.000001706974,0.00003768861,0.0001266103],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1492897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8814746,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06930199348747455,"score_gpt":0.3668878007501858,"score_spread":0.2975858072627112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}