{"id":"W2166406271","doi":"10.1016/j.jat.2004.02.006","title":"Finding best approximation pairs relative to two closed convex sets in Hilbert spaces","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Approximation Theory","topic":"Numerical methods in inverse problems","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":210,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Pacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences; Simon Fraser University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Hilbert space; Monotone polygon; Regular polygon; Space (punctuation); Product (mathematics); Zero (linguistics); Subderivative; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Convex optimization; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005022468,0.001685347,0.003600916,0.003594296,0.001575547,0.005711816,0.00255982,0.003934888,0.004408868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03200699,0.00228737,0.001956187,0.001811777,0.00370054,0.01019588,0.005783733,0.004760818,0.0005955402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002338002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001287879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001326131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001068953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961467,0.001885603,0.0002618471,0.0006831362,0.0007617708,0.0002609335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867653,0.01027409,0.0008423295,0.0006763726,0.0008994453,0.0005425301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002560773,0.0005389019,0.007682359,0.00116448,0.0006065412,0.0005941956,0.002607324,0.3426187,0.01272551,0.4024179,0.006200556,0.2202826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007523071,0.000390011,0.0007873902,0.0001295993,0.0001129646,0.0002427819,0.0007982563,0.7403302,0.006173302,0.2490791,0.001822717,0.00005844653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.108705,0.0008386426,0.8861563,0.0008416198,0.00009575256,0.0001029884,0.0001309324,0.0003118606,0.002816977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5194837,0.0006044984,0.4763407,0.0001568452,0.00007408687,0.0001920625,0.0003983918,0.0003232535,0.002426421],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005711816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02656168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06930199348747455,"score_gpt":0.3668878007501858,"score_spread":0.2975858072627112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}