{"id":"W2166443045","doi":"10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.008","title":"Sources and consequences of bargaining power in supply chains","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Operations Management","topic":"Quality and Supply Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":519,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Tellabs (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining power; Interdependence; Supply chain; Industrial organization; Business; Power (physics); Control (management); Task (project management); Resource dependence theory; Resource (disambiguation); Microeconomics; Supply chain management; Action (physics); Economics; Operations management; Marketing; Management; Computer science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007703965,0.0004867486,0.0005710078,0.003514217,0.003390373,0.005821105,0.001236986,0.002756137,0.02820605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04726577,0.000579205,0.0005774859,0.003103501,0.007353094,0.006278081,0.004734216,0.002370392,0.001173201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00276231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008481911,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000911527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007194843,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954726,0.001916008,0.0001864269,0.0005665052,0.001130548,0.0007278689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586254,0.03045017,0.004646665,0.00234394,0.002232357,0.001701502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001268679,0.00004986817,0.007027073,0.00006079195,0.00003341617,0.0004160303,0.001781267,0.005723771,0.0004394193,0.9658841,0.001232343,0.01722505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005122129,0.00002805625,0.002615982,0.00005201849,0.00002239561,0.0001412521,0.00157337,0.01006288,0.0001939575,0.981921,0.003316314,0.0000214995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5106392,0.001677299,0.1059397,0.01022009,0.0002697915,0.0001596745,0.0002481149,0.0001196739,0.3707264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962287,0.0001757121,0.001004193,0.0001009138,0.00009999015,0.00002992658,0.0000230273,0.00001002497,0.002327413],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02820605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09435862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01458943865975642,"score_gpt":0.2364982966181184,"score_spread":0.221908857958362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}