{"id":"W2166477580","doi":"10.1017/s0008423908081146","title":"The Means to Social Justice: Accounting for Functional Capabilities in the Rawlsian Approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Primary goods; Distributive justice; Criticism; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Just society; Original position; Veil of ignorance; Disadvantaged; Capability approach; Sociology; Egalitarianism; Political science; Law; Positive economics; Economics; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01092861,0.0009658783,0.000867513,0.004491187,0.003107989,0.007168393,0.003108191,0.002868925,0.008843392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01645014,0.0003977455,0.001857721,0.002899389,0.02233178,0.01710193,0.007292294,0.004746673,0.0007600561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007943861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005481468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007174358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00705252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912848,0.004761287,0.0002483136,0.0008982492,0.001918602,0.0008887882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888145,0.006032437,0.0009629097,0.001887092,0.001619261,0.0006837866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000168297,0.000005784745,0.00009792257,0.000007273917,0.000003516987,0.00001479194,0.0001673959,0.0009603119,0.000005568794,0.997112,0.0003416968,0.001282109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000195977,0.000002762274,0.00007318531,0.0000215749,0.000003484038,0.00001186908,0.000101358,0.00260267,0.0000138198,0.9940814,0.003082044,0.000003984216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03625884,0.004390653,0.4643422,0.0295878,0.0005411608,0.0001491051,0.0001666485,0.0001486456,0.4644149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393905,0.001245138,0.04614392,0.00145338,0.0004400158,0.0001938872,0.00005513198,0.0000828211,0.01099532],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01092861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05779672,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.101409023922005,"score_gpt":0.3419332415203149,"score_spread":0.2405242175983099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}