{"id":"W2166498111","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.34292","title":"STREAMLINING THE RISK ANALYSIS PROCESS AND ENSURING THE OPTIMAL ORGANIZATIONS FOR FOOD SAFETY: THE CASE APPLICATION TO BIOTECHNOLOGY OF FUSARIUM SPECIES","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review","topic":"Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fusarium; Mycotoxin; Fusarium solani; Food safety; Biotechnology; Food security; Business; Process (computing); Risk analysis (engineering); Biology; Agriculture; Computer science; Food science; Ecology; Microbiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02052284,0.0009332756,0.000579126,0.001712717,0.003602057,0.006060156,0.001239573,0.003929535,0.00126104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01203092,0.0003500783,0.0006158876,0.001483238,0.00413454,0.003711789,0.002467753,0.002339813,0.0003347225],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005530057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006982035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008760874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01392647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9895752,0.007773188,0.0002989332,0.0002490295,0.001503969,0.0005997753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900303,0.007033403,0.0006329081,0.0002763864,0.001788687,0.0002382745],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002105481,0.000330911,0.00633145,0.002374641,0.0001072369,0.01238439,0.03135079,0.02730407,0.005244758,0.4798969,0.03324214,0.4012222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001005241,0.0009409445,0.005825991,0.003236621,0.000214443,0.00674844,0.06849544,0.03882992,0.01064493,0.2446664,0.6200075,0.0002888891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2008854,0.04500933,0.3903753,0.199519,0.00146608,0.001578437,0.00009226158,0.0003630581,0.1607112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6745124,0.02229946,0.2735757,0.00369269,0.000469493,0.0004154109,0.00004569932,0.00005558736,0.02493352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02052284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1085364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01066536129847645,"score_gpt":0.228172941054276,"score_spread":0.2175075797557996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}