{"id":"W2166566853","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2002.tb00352.x","title":"Cooperatives and the Commodity Political Agenda: A Political Economy Approach","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture Food and Rural Development","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Competition (biology); Politics; Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Business; Function (biology); Agribusiness; Market economy; Economics; Agriculture; Industrial organization; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000439526,0.0003915592,0.000846378,0.0002443936,0.0007544839,0.0008686369,0.0005400852,0.0001164598,0.0005029361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001624325,0.0002706589,0.0002846137,0.0001185477,0.0008191941,0.001414767,0.0001010191,0.0004246032,0.00008648349],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000941205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001508733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02614443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3692869,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974533,0.00003445902,0.0008927146,0.0003841727,0.00001209516,0.001223311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983352,0.0001731054,0.0004503203,0.0002326977,0.0002702351,0.0005384365],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002711222,0.00001662006,0.002048283,0.00003379639,0.0001891974,0.0000124695,0.0003802823,0.0002327054,4.543676e-7,0.9839135,0.01283056,0.0003149808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009051835,0.0002462542,0.05755171,0.00009420647,0.0005464677,0.001946746,0.02801209,0.02147108,0.000008501199,0.05376845,0.8250434,0.002259244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8413538,0.0005212197,0.000008785896,0.04374977,0.0007098946,0.0003325791,0.00006705917,0.00001023657,0.1132467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882976,0.00003615191,0.0000658326,0.008202042,0.002973255,0.0000183884,0.00002281041,0.00002520281,0.0003586668],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0373919111826864,"score_gpt":0.166260103998875,"score_spread":0.1288681928161886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}