{"id":"W2166749710","doi":"10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32405-7","title":"Women’s Views of Elective Primary Caesarean Section","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Caesarean section; Context (archaeology); Blame; Medicine; Originality; Minor (academic); Consumerism; Positive economics; Pregnancy; Qualitative research; Sociology; Economics; Political science; History; Social science; Law; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001490428,0.0001728044,0.000346952,0.0003646306,0.003466051,0.001481079,0.000536981,0.01204251,0.008280204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01214195,0.0002722727,0.0004510061,0.0004243361,0.0007865641,0.0008204847,0.0007583112,0.007381999,0.0006984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004400493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004080744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06207637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1282128,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986052,0.0005400292,0.0001203041,0.00006507671,0.0002358808,0.0004335451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929032,0.003046057,0.0008296336,0.00009273842,0.0009077569,0.00222071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002076775,0.0003630786,0.2103956,0.0004636562,0.0001632656,0.05369962,0.02446455,0.0006215681,0.00217651,0.006381224,0.6626755,0.03651853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000346017,0.00110046,0.3353523,0.001721443,0.000234949,0.0230828,0.07947215,0.0007846525,0.001027605,0.003133535,0.5535079,0.0002362718],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.08062603,0.002253341,0.00003048294,0.8838063,0.005068548,0.00002288071,0.0003737141,0.000006083902,0.02781253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5156683,0.004486933,0.0001218641,0.4484132,0.009414262,0.00005724493,0.0001680314,0.00001856623,0.0216517],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06207637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1234301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02489573771872583,"score_gpt":0.276694110149879,"score_spread":0.2517983724311532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}