{"id":"W2166754333","doi":"10.1142/s1464333213400012","title":"STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BEST PRACTICE PROCESS ELEMENTS AND OUTCOMES IN THE INTERNATIONAL ELECTRICITY SECTOR","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Electricity; Process (computing); Business; Best practice; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Impact assessment; Environmental economics; Environmental science; Engineering; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03428135,0.0005297365,0.0003554356,0.002772782,0.003651527,0.009197878,0.001069909,0.001676135,0.002525746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04136423,0.0002956356,0.0003932487,0.004689982,0.004683894,0.004466635,0.006245694,0.001996843,0.0003495881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01053396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01748549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009298536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01208073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9638867,0.02761429,0.0008554707,0.0007555718,0.004868715,0.002019255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731819,0.01671796,0.001971024,0.001873935,0.004649614,0.001605476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004176455,0.002283438,0.05459137,0.0009475713,0.0001351888,0.003237225,0.1081845,0.07810156,0.002883087,0.3488784,0.007938948,0.392401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002369165,0.002007557,0.04112275,0.001761648,0.0001793478,0.001074983,0.4198667,0.06557817,0.01218981,0.3202808,0.1354246,0.0002767808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7099006,0.0004064323,0.04871438,0.007564487,0.00006998002,0.0009145042,0.0001200284,0.0001991153,0.2321106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863344,0.0001997612,0.01143215,0.0001464258,0.000004535311,0.0001373893,0.00005724378,0.0000235234,0.001664471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03428135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1812992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01417652322307377,"score_gpt":0.3249586367408879,"score_spread":0.3107821135178142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}