{"id":"W2166828161","doi":"10.1016/j.copbio.2007.11.008","title":"Nanotoxicity: the growing need for in vivo study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Current Opinion in Biotechnology","topic":"Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":712,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome Canada","keywords":"Nanotoxicology; Nanotechnology; In vivo; Biochemical engineering; Biology; Materials science; Nanoparticle; Biotechnology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1549254784539635,"score_gpt":0.421177743540175,"score_spread":0.2662522650862115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."},"direct_labels":[],"classifier":{"requested":true,"available":true,"version":"metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90","frame_rows_covered":4299418,"decision_targets":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","randomized_trial","nonrandomized_trial","observational","systematic_review","meta_analysis","case_report","qualitative","simulation_or_modeling","bench_or_experimental","theoretical_or_conceptual","not_applicable"],"score_encoding":"uint16_le_65535","score_resolution":0.000015259021896696422,"interpretation":"Scores imitate each teacher on the enriched screening sample; they are not calibrated prevalence probabilities for the full frame.","warning":null},"prediction":{"classifier_version":"metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90","candidate_union":["bench_or_experimental","not_applicable"],"consensus_intersection":["not_applicable"],"score_encoding":"uint16_le_65535","score_resolution":0.000015259021896696422,"scores":{"codex":{"metaresearch":0.0004882887006942855,"metaepi_narrow":0.0001373311970702678,"metaepi_broad":0.0006256198977645533,"bibliometrics":0.0005951018539711605,"sts":0.00012207217517357137,"scholarly_communication":0.00006103608758678569,"open_science":0.0002136263065537499,"research_integrity":0.000686655985351339,"randomized_trial":0.000015259021896696422,"nonrandomized_trial":0.000289921416037232,"observational":0,"systematic_review":0.02038605325398642,"meta_analysis":0.000030518043793392844,"case_report":0.000015259021896696422,"qualitative":0,"simulation_or_modeling":0.000030518043793392844,"bench_or_experimental":0.04620431830319677,"theoretical_or_conceptual":0.00030518043793392844,"not_applicable":0.07875181200885023,"design_other":0.21217669947356374},"gemma":{"metaresearch":0.0006561379415579462,"metaepi_narrow":0.00016784924086366064,"metaepi_broad":0.00012207217517357137,"bibliometrics":0.0002746623941405356,"sts":0.00030518043793392844,"scholarly_communication":0.0009460593575951781,"open_science":0.00024414435034714275,"research_integrity":0.00039673456931410697,"randomized_trial":0.000015259021896696422,"nonrandomized_trial":0.000045777065690089265,"observational":0,"systematic_review":0.007309071488517586,"meta_analysis":0.000030518043793392844,"case_report":0,"qualitative":0.00039673456931410697,"simulation_or_modeling":0,"bench_or_experimental":0.42870222018768595,"theoretical_or_conceptual":0.00009155413138017853,"not_applicable":0.9808346684977493}},"interpretation":"Scores imitate each teacher on the enriched screening sample; they are not calibrated prevalence probabilities for the full frame."}}