{"id":"W2166871461","doi":"10.37693/pjos.2013.5.9756","title":"A structural-cognitive semiotic analysis of the Qur'anic story \"Joseph and his Brothers\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Journal of Semiotics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Portsmouth","keywords":"Semiotics; Narrative; Argumentative; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Narratology; Sociology; Narrative inquiry; Icon; Terminology; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Literature; Philosophy; History; Art; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006967735,0.0001730272,0.0004922129,0.0004698545,0.0001095819,0.00006943307,0.0003101978,0.0001398551,0.002159079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004784727,0.000110806,0.0003362494,0.000854627,0.0002151156,0.0002843815,0.00005790217,0.0004857673,0.00001597692],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000635806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008775544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001134321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005595907,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981295,0.0004640578,0.0005565703,0.000175338,0.0003794464,0.0002950605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977043,0.0004723949,0.0008233482,0.0002696442,0.0005715272,0.0001587552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003929273,0.001244134,0.5384321,0.0003229802,0.04463388,0.0001139078,0.0956637,0.0001231696,0.01033364,0.02096221,0.02021708,0.2675603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001873463,0.000241415,0.9657168,0.0001196714,0.005153962,0.000295545,0.01987741,0.0005742792,0.0003447413,0.004797843,0.0006624233,0.0003424139],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931548,0.002338214,0.0004671664,0.00126697,0.0005560217,0.0001837204,0.00002229172,0.00000966156,0.00200118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998529,0.0000806291,0.0001229398,0.0005809421,0.0001628061,0.000002552094,0.000004312321,0.0000200588,0.0004967451],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4272847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02044075095997507,"score_gpt":0.2721599654520907,"score_spread":0.2517192144921157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}