{"id":"W2166900235","doi":"10.1017/s1053837213000205","title":"ECONOPHYSICS: A NEW CHALLENGE FOR FINANCIAL ECONOMICS?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Econophysics; Mainstream; Mainstream economics; Economics; Field (mathematics); Neoclassical economics; Financial econometrics; Finance; Financial economics; Positive economics; Financial market; Applied economics; Political science; Mathematics; Law; Indirect finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004649374,0.0001840767,0.0009282745,0.0002093671,0.00006488163,0.00002898606,0.0006816826,0.00009585053,0.001703952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006451291,0.0001707138,0.000986859,0.0000417927,0.00009501728,0.0005039586,0.00007557303,0.0001431305,0.0002385374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001141739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003695991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005949921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001477906,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979164,0.00001686386,0.001585726,0.0002311691,0.00002005732,0.0002298014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963622,0.00007838676,0.002902699,0.0004748675,0.00006214077,0.00011968],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009257183,0.0001311477,0.001029389,0.00008983535,0.0005189297,4.896859e-7,0.001170354,0.00187652,0.0000756552,0.61226,0.3769,0.005854985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008026109,0.0001370919,0.001143589,0.00002153127,0.0000333496,0.000008506805,0.0000486911,0.001356371,0.0000272017,0.1204971,0.8757304,0.000193553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6781443,0.0677278,0.008250355,0.0184224,0.05703451,0.002600666,0.0005263611,0.00005013522,0.1672434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8855046,0.0006501416,0.003692851,0.0004552738,0.003753663,0.00002983973,0.000003015156,0.00008694171,0.1058237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4988303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03444205329857974,"score_gpt":0.1927237355357984,"score_spread":0.1582816822372186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}