{"id":"W2166911023","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01820.x","title":"An empirical exploration of data quality in DNA‐based population inventories","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Molecular Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":494,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Statistics; Reliability (semiconductor); Population; Sample size determination; Sample (material); Data collection; Abundance (ecology); Limiting; Sampling bias; Quality (philosophy); Data quality; Econometrics; Ecology; Demography; Mathematics; Operations management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3395661,0.0006952825,0.0009456123,0.006109274,0.002225421,0.00652249,0.003224435,0.002010669,0.001474122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7238508,0.001215446,0.001360292,0.01021035,0.01471133,0.01163557,0.005201101,0.002896533,0.0002193318],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003452562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002111953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004766302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004875269,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6954696,0.2279014,0.02221373,0.01707112,0.03512073,0.00222348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.06970995,0.8318747,0.05312726,0.02594048,0.01860855,0.0007390454],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003179723,0.00008976684,0.9363842,0.000692073,0.0007386255,0.000211223,0.008018014,0.003073175,0.0004512433,0.01498367,0.0006547565,0.03438528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001020042,0.001519277,0.8592141,0.002722584,0.0007559832,0.002641423,0.01500168,0.03506697,0.00397188,0.06132891,0.01738965,0.0002854805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8125581,0.006584726,0.1617066,0.007549578,0.0001408786,0.0005737334,0.001761387,0.0001300109,0.008994986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801142,0.0005663807,0.01764521,0.0005192953,0.00006161678,0.0001718402,0.0006087021,0.00004911966,0.0002637178],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3395661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8144326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08615435402667605,"score_gpt":0.3533880755261479,"score_spread":0.2672337214994718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}