{"id":"W2166911023","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01820.x","title":"An empirical exploration of data quality in DNA‐based population inventories","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Molecular Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":494,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Statistics; Reliability (semiconductor); Population; Sample size determination; Sample (material); Data collection; Abundance (ecology); Limiting; Sampling bias; Quality (philosophy); Data quality; Econometrics; Ecology; Demography; Mathematics; Operations management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006516691,0.00005985424,0.0001141115,0.0000360052,0.00003463289,0.00000393161,0.00016473,0.0001141098,0.0003975765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002478462,0.0000657554,0.00001309085,0.0001839869,0.00008023874,0.0004773115,0.00004114736,0.00006075984,0.00002436187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007054283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002413902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002125503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005626328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986915,0.0006009144,0.0002462878,0.0002472785,0.00009308043,0.0001209558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994462,0.00005042694,0.00009415059,0.0003736716,0.000006317913,0.00002927419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001548942,0.0001474792,0.9946245,0.000002673456,0.000001954698,0.000003622758,0.00008657957,0.002056882,0.001687263,0.001101898,0.00007586499,0.000195811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002763164,0.00007972655,0.9896663,9.383615e-7,0.000004636805,5.276111e-7,0.00004226611,0.002625881,0.001235522,0.005776571,0.0002251794,0.00006608319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931523,0.00000331007,0.005583915,0.0006794585,0.00007372996,0.0001260685,0.000003168831,0.00001107465,0.0003669843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964269,5.31971e-7,0.002448738,0.0008983202,0.000003926136,0.00001612584,0.000190838,0.000004469524,0.00001011204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005413777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4353184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08615435402667605,"score_gpt":0.3533880755261479,"score_spread":0.2672337214994718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}