{"id":"W2166915007","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cps077","title":"Testing of WindFIRM/ForestGALES_BC: A hybrid-mechanistic model for predicting windthrow in partially harvested stands","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Tree Root and Stability Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"FPInnovations","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Windthrow; Environmental science; Canopy; Common spatial pattern; Storm; Tree (set theory); Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Geology; Geography; Forestry; Meteorology; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008883901,0.000836184,0.0004813732,0.0003499023,0.0003686088,0.0006724381,0.001625844,0.001007473,0.002027737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001349365,0.000392098,0.0006838962,0.0002595653,0.0003156255,0.0006360839,0.0005012092,0.0007114002,0.0002775923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001005263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001446232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08649763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08449866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998012,0.00005017985,0.00001203867,0.00004938793,0.00004506327,0.00004209061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991867,0.0004354198,0.00006176267,0.00008098978,0.0001378507,0.00009727916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001152729,0.0001148475,0.007570877,0.0000327554,0.00003097054,0.00004093835,0.00001900262,0.9862744,0.00102308,0.0003106125,0.000467892,0.003999286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002420222,0.00004811525,0.001389752,0.00000281095,0.000005772004,0.0000060878,0.000008457871,0.9977912,0.0004248574,0.00006610939,0.0002268376,0.000005870207],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746526,0.00007559956,0.01562878,0.0001421515,0.00004501432,0.0001382183,0.002590404,0.001510075,0.005217213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842319,0.00003488697,0.01263893,0.00004110165,0.000007138126,0.00007332446,0.001635173,0.0001035829,0.001233918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08649763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1719883,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1133271410924877,"score_gpt":0.3688931862090484,"score_spread":0.2555660451165607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}