{"id":"W2167115244","doi":"10.1557/proc-734-b9.19","title":"An Equivalent Circuit Approach to Evaluating Conductivity of Polymer-Filler Composites","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MRS Proceedings","topic":"Smart Materials for Construction","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Xerox (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Filler (materials); Composite material; Composite number; Percolation (cognitive psychology); Electrical conductor; Equivalent circuit; Resistor; Particle (ecology); Monolayer; Randomness; Conductance; Mathematics; Electrical engineering; Nanotechnology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003554031,0.0001435322,0.0001889657,0.00005565371,0.0001165257,0.00004870147,0.0002395599,0.0000583824,0.001195463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003800115,0.0001408749,0.00004034646,0.000269815,0.0001577541,0.0004748741,0.0001306091,0.00006715778,0.0001849434],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001072236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002396298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002055322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002196788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986535,0.0000167848,0.0002455951,0.0003895765,0.0004294547,0.0002651381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995703,0.0000108759,0.000131193,0.0001360646,0.00002561997,0.0001259482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009414475,0.0001303664,0.1276527,0.00002076761,0.000006415159,1.00848e-7,0.001210757,0.00005436589,0.8683449,0.0003365718,0.0004102329,0.001823392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005151287,0.0005129098,0.1002516,0.00003151987,0.0000467488,0.00006076871,0.0007281645,0.009122428,0.8875858,0.0004709649,0.0002242281,0.0004497268],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777671,0.00001442193,0.0001293991,0.00004471476,0.0001507303,0.0003038951,0.000004450693,0.00007074381,0.02151454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965652,9.740453e-7,0.003140076,0.0000693914,0.00006652848,0.00003222584,0.000002203191,0.00001891241,0.0001045452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0274011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05784226323926061,"score_gpt":0.2681036408414862,"score_spread":0.2102613776022256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}