{"id":"W2167224405","doi":"10.1109/tmag.2007.916488","title":"Balancing Boundary and Discretization Errors Using an Iterative Absorbing Boundary Condition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Magnetics","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretization; Boundary value problem; Truncation error; Finite element method; Boundary (topology); Mathematical analysis; Radar cross-section; Applied mathematics; Polynomial; Truncation (statistics); Iterative method; Mathematics; Scattering; Computer science; Algorithm; Physics; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000613249,0.0001774983,0.0001687406,0.0001361248,0.0007771773,0.0001070422,0.00006111545,0.00004398243,0.0003862882],"category_scores_gemma":[7.285813e-7,0.000188612,0.00006840179,0.0002072564,0.00016244,0.0002377687,0.000001196211,0.0001990658,0.00000756586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003207645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005746373,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001624886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001716845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990608,0.00006748932,0.0002131387,0.0002764019,0.0001590724,0.0002231191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995699,0.00003532392,0.00006995094,0.0001715759,0.00005539005,0.00009784115],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002501676,0.002590308,0.02324167,0.000156698,0.0008320404,0.0000737146,0.024077,0.2813022,0.4473557,0.0008568091,0.0003295742,0.2189342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00617109,0.00466171,0.03000326,0.0005783273,0.001857216,0.0003166037,0.006618456,0.7356848,0.2014041,0.007069442,0.001795716,0.003839324],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.58418,0.0000340874,0.4152643,0.00004467167,0.00008544944,0.00006227322,0.00003068815,0.00003058926,0.0002679244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961002,0.00002105935,0.00324947,0.00006238917,0.0001070257,0.00001042834,0.00004199555,0.00002508303,0.0003823254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4543826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7691373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01406569377254806,"score_gpt":0.2526748750561313,"score_spread":0.2386091812835833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}