{"id":"W2167224405","doi":"10.1109/tmag.2007.916488","title":"Balancing Boundary and Discretization Errors Using an Iterative Absorbing Boundary Condition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Magnetics","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretization; Boundary value problem; Truncation error; Finite element method; Boundary (topology); Mathematical analysis; Radar cross-section; Applied mathematics; Polynomial; Truncation (statistics); Iterative method; Mathematics; Scattering; Computer science; Algorithm; Physics; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001371932,0.0005765197,0.0007431152,0.0005640537,0.0007874828,0.001021321,0.001435117,0.001218367,0.001809883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005083055,0.0003337414,0.0004548706,0.0003764146,0.0008522154,0.00099436,0.001558871,0.001230127,0.000738073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005704647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001162251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001890782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001294846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989591,0.0002302079,0.00006227149,0.0000853865,0.0005942705,0.00006887122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981596,0.0009188397,0.0001529248,0.0003054193,0.0004004821,0.00006269573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001425646,0.0001322298,0.0009890255,0.0001529784,0.00002865579,0.0002028988,0.000392559,0.6559789,0.08751603,0.1147644,0.001640073,0.1380596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001104005,0.00002224371,0.00005979553,0.00001229636,0.000004533968,0.00003993339,0.00001070631,0.986064,0.007328059,0.004528237,0.001909309,0.00000990406],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005658059,0.00002999575,0.9922698,0.00004465456,0.00002173734,0.00002958664,0.000006826878,0.0002059549,0.001733413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1343974,0.00006139523,0.8634419,0.00004738965,0.00002041312,0.0001399812,0.00003628874,0.0001400685,0.001715166],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001890782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007255554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01406569377254806,"score_gpt":0.2526748750561313,"score_spread":0.2386091812835833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}