{"id":"W2167358219","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1320901111","title":"Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":376,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung Multireligiöser und Multiethnischer Gesellschaften; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Leverhulme Trust; Universität Bielefeld; Georgetown University","keywords":"Outgroup; Prejudice (legal term); Ingroups and outgroups; Operationalization; Social psychology; Contact hypothesis; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Association (psychology); Contact theory; Social environment; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002800033,0.000340099,0.0004925604,0.0006175578,0.000936812,0.0008406446,0.0003353185,0.00041299,0.003286199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01295399,0.0002132038,0.0004176298,0.0005101463,0.0009706297,0.0004899003,0.002023827,0.0007020904,0.0001301514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003041998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004502991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003160491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008189552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954692,0.003034958,0.0001599684,0.0006201984,0.0004778183,0.0002379052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833217,0.007805848,0.003476474,0.002882602,0.001188823,0.00132455],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003154091,0.0003070862,0.9825911,0.00009709266,0.0004125913,0.00008585813,0.002002068,0.0002281305,0.003227385,0.0006308689,0.00008038832,0.01002209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003137198,0.0002443331,0.9980732,0.00001485216,0.00009178725,0.00003345266,0.0005434581,0.0001423802,0.0004835216,0.0001518331,0.0002116527,0.000006301515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970707,0.0001686726,0.0005983159,0.00003447631,0.00001166471,0.00001644265,0.00007887913,0.000005281488,0.002015679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994612,0.00003347686,0.0003602831,0.0000144763,0.000005302428,0.0000109622,0.00003566184,0.000001949386,0.00007663411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003286199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01480818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02941070579119683,"score_gpt":0.357595256769724,"score_spread":0.3281845509785272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}