{"id":"W2167358219","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1320901111","title":"Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":376,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung Multireligiöser und Multiethnischer Gesellschaften; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Leverhulme Trust; Universität Bielefeld; Georgetown University","keywords":"Outgroup; Prejudice (legal term); Ingroups and outgroups; Operationalization; Social psychology; Contact hypothesis; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Association (psychology); Contact theory; Social environment; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003358598,0.00009787577,0.0002603143,0.0001267168,0.0002777366,0.00001715047,0.0008541711,0.0001305747,0.00003963738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002567347,0.00006374349,0.0001387011,0.000513831,0.001986865,0.0003080289,0.00008020949,0.0001759253,0.000003993046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004989123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002099731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001717438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001871283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980887,0.00008047874,0.0003281719,0.0002265455,0.001087671,0.0001884193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981268,0.000977775,0.0005508692,0.000008009946,0.0002930997,0.00004344575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002110177,0.0001034646,0.01812355,0.00003813966,0.00004556383,3.72559e-9,0.005663881,0.000002273718,0.1277816,0.8419558,0.002553567,0.003521062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001445763,0.003466654,0.5146345,0.0007274526,0.00006100621,0.000002939697,0.00422123,0.00016678,0.3716804,0.1004012,0.002869267,0.0003227303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8243414,0.00002479228,0.000001769615,0.003678826,0.00009760442,0.0002183947,0.000008694282,0.00001091575,0.1716176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989419,0.00001055377,0.00004431819,0.0005815298,0.000190217,0.000009267814,8.290795e-8,0.000003315739,0.0002188119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7415546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7320687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02941070579119683,"score_gpt":0.357595256769724,"score_spread":0.3281845509785272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}