{"id":"W2167394785","doi":"10.1139/f04-017","title":"Fish-habitat modeling for gap analysis to conserve the endangered Topeka shiner (<i>Notropis topeka</i>)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Notropis; Endangered species; Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Canonical correspondence analysis; Land cover; Watershed; Fishery; Land use; Environmental science; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004835821,0.0002249193,0.0002118573,0.0003189864,0.0002629511,0.0003691867,0.0004133875,0.0002765452,0.002088117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001595181,0.0001471746,0.0004409241,0.0002544306,0.0001425985,0.0003291593,0.0003776152,0.0003110016,0.0001770066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005383149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008319491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01813557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02244584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998844,0.0000630039,0.000006312072,0.0000192692,0.00001191509,0.00001516147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995814,0.0003021411,0.00004011629,0.00001517446,0.00004011641,0.00002096799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009005451,0.00009224647,0.02492064,0.00003479634,0.00007917938,0.00007949503,0.00008517583,0.9446107,0.0006652878,0.003011885,0.001050589,0.02527987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000480171,0.00001139252,0.001378648,0.000002195716,0.000005712911,0.000008197661,0.00001361666,0.9973302,0.00006851673,0.0009760724,0.0001991694,0.000001535862],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7344822,0.0003043226,0.2593892,0.0007733393,0.00003611211,0.00008607611,0.00091642,0.0007993649,0.003212994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513248,0.00009385446,0.04649299,0.00004368073,0.00001417528,0.0001214741,0.0004899992,0.00003526214,0.0013838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01813557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03606004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02791750544827955,"score_gpt":0.2295417261285707,"score_spread":0.2016242206802911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}