{"id":"W2167443966","doi":"10.1089/fpd.2006.3.447","title":"Methodological Quality Assessment of Review Articles Evaluating Interventions to Improve Microbial Food Safety","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foodborne Pathogens and Disease","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Public Health Agency of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Generalizability theory; Quality (philosophy); Critical appraisal; Systematic review; Management science; Comparability; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Psychology; MEDLINE; Political science; Pathology; Nursing; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001676143,0.0001386798,0.0003331249,0.00001131143,0.000165763,0.00002307391,0.000126268,0.00003567732,0.0002665973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005635346,0.00006028654,0.0002910485,0.0002431362,0.00005781012,0.00005135234,0.0001478862,0.00006776371,0.000003882849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001667564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002326649,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007917514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002368208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980456,0.0006003458,0.0005761801,0.0003521455,0.000199121,0.0002266221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990656,0.0002834852,0.0001663962,0.0001006024,0.0001164651,0.0002674402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003009067,0.0008893603,0.006377414,0.001214597,0.00003407783,0.000005490679,0.0000172028,0.00003529303,0.7519371,0.008685797,0.0004533292,0.2300494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000310274,0.001734116,0.9918906,0.0005374903,0.0001548397,0.000001486387,0.000069211,0.00005222768,0.001064879,0.002983072,0.0009686326,0.0002331471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873912,0.005562979,0.0006036175,0.004192666,0.00006316487,0.0005351972,0.001385861,0.00003510866,0.0002302312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935626,0.0002269043,0.00537882,0.0005368624,0.0001008013,0.00004146278,0.0001193651,0.000001129704,0.00003203539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9855132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2919053,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2211278982774638,"score_gpt":0.4051835213296882,"score_spread":0.1840556230522244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}