{"id":"W2167443966","doi":"10.1089/fpd.2006.3.447","title":"Methodological Quality Assessment of Review Articles Evaluating Interventions to Improve Microbial Food Safety","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foodborne Pathogens and Disease","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Public Health Agency of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Generalizability theory; Quality (philosophy); Critical appraisal; Systematic review; Management science; Comparability; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Psychology; MEDLINE; Political science; Pathology; Nursing; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4944656,0.003552393,0.0167909,0.04900273,0.002959209,0.0109907,0.00536323,0.004853052,0.006061861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8310665,0.003834683,0.02430171,0.04100517,0.003885655,0.005909209,0.00627093,0.003494094,0.0008040752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01309492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02064312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006600356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009406416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2784698,0.2446861,0.4002092,0.009728538,0.06413946,0.002766864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.146037,0.5762157,0.1335264,0.02020589,0.1214738,0.002541166],"domain_codex":"reporting","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003835397,0.0001674236,0.03621506,0.7157176,0.0637992,0.0006864747,0.00611673,0.001304524,0.001146209,0.002708499,0.007079032,0.1612238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006558827,0.002719971,0.08012384,0.5128577,0.2716494,0.001562526,0.005246391,0.005244025,0.006382976,0.0215424,0.08524308,0.0008689456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03861427,0.7036564,0.09298152,0.01386868,0.009178218,0.1158772,0.01233673,0.0007036002,0.01278337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3334617,0.1874779,0.1938923,0.006370639,0.002840501,0.2661315,0.006790418,0.0004772847,0.002557765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5055344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6234139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2211278982774638,"score_gpt":0.4051835213296882,"score_spread":0.1840556230522244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}