{"id":"W2167462623","doi":"10.1109/tpwrs.2003.820711","title":"Coordination in Markets With Nonconvexities as a Mathematical Program With Equilibrium Constraints—Part I: A Solution Procedure","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","topic":"Optimal Power Flow Distribution","field":"Engineering","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Lagrange multiplier; Economic dispatch; Mixed complementarity problem; Linear complementarity problem; Multiplier (economics); Linear programming; Mathematical economics; Complementarity (molecular biology); Computer science; Mathematics; Electric power system; Nonlinear system; Economics; Power (physics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002263268,0.0009457542,0.00114315,0.0006183406,0.0006116594,0.001715138,0.001232971,0.001461458,0.005871498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003711082,0.0007498926,0.001059616,0.0009376705,0.001369451,0.001422576,0.001713068,0.001925462,0.0005958101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001518066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002256593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003708052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003750798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994029,0.0002574301,0.00002459159,0.0001244759,0.0001129915,0.00007767614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998615,0.001065277,0.0000919739,0.0000602623,0.0001286126,0.00003883012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000280911,0.00006274471,0.000206348,0.00009691869,0.00002039295,0.00009179622,0.00008690909,0.7947789,0.0006242923,0.1834701,0.001509115,0.01902445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002244741,0.00001744079,0.00002602138,0.00001072144,0.000004616496,0.00001349728,0.00002295699,0.9664945,0.0002766222,0.03148282,0.001624159,0.000004174095],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003819069,0.00004803241,0.9924892,0.0001849273,0.00001089942,0.00006339699,0.00003840651,0.00006319115,0.003282869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1266092,0.0002507389,0.8659722,0.0001115509,0.00005360793,0.0006595842,0.0001502758,0.0001153638,0.00607751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005871498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01964211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00731066663993857,"score_gpt":0.2150448203760154,"score_spread":0.2077341537360768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}