{"id":"W2167485490","doi":"10.1111/1477-7053.00031","title":"A House for the Future: Debating Second Chamber Reform in the United Kingdom","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Government and Opposition","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Canadian Political Science Association","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Subject matter; Commission; Law; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01773295,0.0002807597,0.0005910013,0.001219839,0.01142119,0.0208353,0.00133456,0.01222589,0.006565101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03170205,0.0005835181,0.0004836208,0.001557893,0.01150666,0.01133193,0.007620164,0.007032597,0.0009051141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02887254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02217394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1898136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2921502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9786245,0.009483701,0.001112125,0.001435949,0.003010464,0.006333284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803718,0.01002458,0.00183111,0.001166838,0.003801384,0.002804222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002065517,0.00003972834,0.002883546,0.0003669057,0.00002509222,0.001343935,0.04248686,0.0004413193,0.0005144037,0.8176596,0.1010112,0.03302085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005297105,0.00007930025,0.007229966,0.0009355645,0.00002071699,0.0002741057,0.02682724,0.0003122576,0.0007328736,0.02296926,0.9404513,0.0001144458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1696298,0.09632534,0.002210092,0.5010681,0.007897484,0.0001228757,0.0001172007,0.00006108226,0.2225681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8484126,0.01138966,0.0009455708,0.05800762,0.0008352558,0.0000797082,0.00004752835,0.00006609158,0.08021596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1898136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3774176,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02289512215733367,"score_gpt":0.2743442982708382,"score_spread":0.2514491761135045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}