{"id":"W2167542299","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01386.x","title":"SEXUALLY ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION IN A MATING SYSTEM: COMBINING EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE APPROACHES TO ADDRESS EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo; Royal Ontario Museum; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Coevolution; Antagonistic Coevolution; Interspecific competition; Mating; Evolutionary biology; Clade; Sexual conflict; Phylogenetic comparative methods; Mating system; Sexual selection; Zoology; Phylogenetic tree; Ecology; Genetics; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001429425,0.0001353582,0.0001688319,0.00003350259,0.0003231379,0.00003889263,0.00007258262,0.00007155279,0.00003246644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003017701,0.00006964466,0.00001948637,0.0004269314,0.00006683653,0.0002895378,0.00005000412,0.00009817635,0.000030554],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002266675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006136471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003006882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001156655,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998888,0.00008983198,0.0002280792,0.000389662,0.0001822155,0.0002222722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997323,0.00004337174,0.00007784111,0.00003995991,0.00004531347,0.00006118618],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000269611,0.001325345,0.1727211,0.0002819051,0.0000225115,0.00001316519,0.007240097,0.0008020858,0.8013427,0.01007449,0.001140371,0.004766602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003999353,0.0008986092,0.9553044,0.0002588306,0.00002172347,0.0001251835,0.01972898,0.01963568,0.002876333,0.00004487458,0.0002443718,0.0004610727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960247,0.001914665,0.00006917195,0.0001957102,0.0001067496,0.0004312061,0.00001499795,0.0001044693,0.001138335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994098,0.000003939715,0.000196,0.000009515355,0.0001458684,0.00008822845,0.00003422963,0.000001084609,0.0001113575],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7984664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2840027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1767181014421318,"score_gpt":0.264614541751215,"score_spread":0.08789644030908311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}