{"id":"W2167542299","doi":"10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01386.x","title":"SEXUALLY ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION IN A MATING SYSTEM: COMBINING EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE APPROACHES TO ADDRESS EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo; Royal Ontario Museum; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Coevolution; Antagonistic Coevolution; Interspecific competition; Mating; Evolutionary biology; Clade; Sexual conflict; Phylogenetic comparative methods; Mating system; Sexual selection; Zoology; Phylogenetic tree; Ecology; Genetics; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002240604,0.0005486839,0.0006215296,0.001555707,0.0004356781,0.0005825476,0.000975819,0.0007062861,0.0008299079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002060665,0.0004879113,0.0005378408,0.001445608,0.001605681,0.0009339129,0.001060354,0.001154602,0.0001001362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006776022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002904808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000657093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001558103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983801,0.0008145684,0.0001149534,0.0003163026,0.0002623916,0.0001117158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996982,0.001429004,0.0008352349,0.0004332736,0.0001309623,0.0001894445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002955779,0.0006306635,0.04856109,0.0003181999,0.000318643,0.0001127461,0.0004019947,0.001627453,0.9224081,0.001516186,0.0000608955,0.02374843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001846732,0.004771758,0.7889691,0.0001134359,0.0006106068,0.001601706,0.0008523262,0.03111706,0.1637417,0.00373878,0.004138547,0.0001603655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899524,0.000721797,0.008261715,0.00005849374,0.00001344336,0.00004628746,0.0001043625,0.000025826,0.0008156784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678925,0.0006026013,0.03013119,0.0003076891,0.00004433489,0.0003480495,0.000343144,0.00003754363,0.0002931175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002240604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01184958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1767181014421318,"score_gpt":0.264614541751215,"score_spread":0.08789644030908311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}