{"id":"W2167561774","doi":"10.1136/bmj.330.7497.960","title":"Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":642,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Confounding; Critical appraisal; Computer science; Data science; Cohort; Cohort study; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06255418,0.004062209,0.008124805,0.02196549,0.001398066,0.003920374,0.007890156,0.006241916,0.09072205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.308285,0.003292216,0.006437261,0.01248552,0.00399363,0.003900069,0.003584086,0.00684326,0.05905169],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002706554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01335544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004900725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01041571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9255192,0.03915299,0.02005438,0.001550284,0.01306415,0.0006590469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5339928,0.2900824,0.02885938,0.01118032,0.132543,0.003342036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001803512,0.0000779172,0.0001401647,0.03686281,0.0002528054,0.0001540724,0.0003759931,0.0002349223,0.000542591,0.001394021,0.8730035,0.08678077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001141074,0.000206079,0.00269532,0.05942587,0.0007152752,0.0009026139,0.0005221724,0.001456956,0.0007680856,0.01607466,0.9157699,0.0003220043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001371233,0.2499675,0.2067182,0.1487376,0.1356678,0.1464436,0.06151019,0.01298303,0.03660082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00346085,0.1318244,0.5334486,0.04349738,0.04348288,0.1780504,0.01260491,0.001897379,0.05173325],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9374458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3308221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6296244711903284,"score_gpt":0.6381613101056407,"score_spread":0.008536838915312317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}