{"id":"W2167739703","doi":"10.1016/s0195-9255(03)00113-6","title":"Cumulative effect assessment in Canada: a regional framework for aquatic ecosystems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Stressor; Context (archaeology); Sustainable development; Environmental resource management; Aquatic ecosystem; Process (computing); Cumulative effects; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Environmental quality; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Ecology; Geography; Psychology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007678562,0.001420235,0.001595757,0.008530761,0.002576555,0.003945347,0.004250928,0.0009473419,0.00289204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01002985,0.0004410723,0.002325974,0.008010884,0.00209094,0.00153576,0.002091919,0.001134819,0.0002476453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05426417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08960961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9720492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9887657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958489,0.000822365,0.000249019,0.0003180237,0.002442539,0.0003191351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912553,0.001003376,0.000488248,0.0003436473,0.00645873,0.0004506096],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001869775,0.000150499,0.04942349,0.003374952,0.001792575,0.000577193,0.002150679,0.2806966,0.002658067,0.1080825,0.04757464,0.5033319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001207444,0.0005532835,0.2144703,0.004429927,0.006866017,0.001186129,0.004545502,0.1596081,0.003378149,0.1168073,0.4874645,0.0005700192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1205822,0.170437,0.5305151,0.01890903,0.0009901074,0.002111652,0.02461965,0.003523939,0.1283113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6205075,0.0638873,0.2816913,0.001568853,0.0002206748,0.0007792134,0.005427725,0.0004174344,0.02550007],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05426417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3937159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0190629204048203,"score_gpt":0.3450755464443817,"score_spread":0.3260126260395614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}