{"id":"W2167968600","doi":"10.1109/bibm.2008.46","title":"Feature Selection for Tandem Mass Spectrum Quality Assessment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Computer science; Support vector machine; Feature selection; Pattern recognition (psychology); Artificial intelligence; Set (abstract data type); Feature (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Selection (genetic algorithm); Tandem; Relevance (law); Quality assessment; Feature vector; Machine learning; Data mining; Evaluation methods; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003683293,0.001109776,0.001288716,0.00271176,0.0004776977,0.0008471216,0.000916319,0.000682181,0.001463699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009573057,0.0002382451,0.001011999,0.0018476,0.0003217888,0.0007903411,0.0005573515,0.0007521617,0.0008055458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002830669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005297372,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001042364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008515051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982378,0.0006079349,0.0001594295,0.0002759997,0.0006251183,0.00009362294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966561,0.001700608,0.0003364448,0.0002555221,0.0009982829,0.00005303057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000507188,0.0002267253,0.006777573,0.0003923594,0.0002309263,0.0002737014,0.0001058446,0.02623443,0.04125758,0.001421819,0.005304263,0.9172676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001314911,0.0006085397,0.02128543,0.00009013549,0.0002985181,0.0008964257,0.0001362353,0.8931193,0.06489979,0.007424508,0.01097746,0.0001321238],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0554494,0.001217099,0.9387262,0.0002141499,0.000070014,0.0002066349,0.0005437937,0.002754286,0.0008184345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4857806,0.0005309533,0.5100009,0.0001163189,0.0001057643,0.0003630894,0.002129514,0.0001651648,0.0008076361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003683293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01947939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04490895665356944,"score_gpt":0.3503914680301046,"score_spread":0.3054825113765352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}